Randy McMurchy wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 10/12/05 21:59 CST:
GGV allows tinkering with Ghostscript settings. Last time I looked at
Evince, it didn't have this feature. Has this changed?
I'm not sure how else to say this other than just to come out and
say the first t
Randy McMurchy wrote:
it seems so pointless to install Epiphany when it itself
> requires a Gecko rendering engine (Mozilla or Firefox or Thunderbird)
> as a required dependency.
Despite not being a GROAN user myself, I can't see the point in putting
all the rest of it in the book and then miss
It's definitely a PITA, that's for sure. But to some people, building
linux from scratch is a PITA ;) I'd suggest putting epiphany in only
because it is GNOME's default browser. Without it BLFS has an
"incomplete" GNOME install. I say leave it in for the sake of
"completeness" and allow the reader
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 10:57 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> [cc'd to BLFS-Dev in hopes of further discussion on some of these topics]
>
> Simon Geard wrote these words on 10/12/05 04:41 CST:
>
> > Yep, that's the one I've seen mentioned on the hal lists. Is it simply a
> > case of adding that line
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 08:13 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
>
> +1 PITA
hm the whole gnome stuff is going to be a REALPITA
but without epiphany you will NOT get (y/h)elp and almost everything
which has html content will not be displayed within a gome window
(AF
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
+1 PITA
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
