Re: FreeType2 Patent Violation?

2005-11-27 Thread Jürg Billeter
On Sam, 2005-11-26 at 21:12 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I also think that many distros turn on the switch as mentioned in the link above, and have never heard an issue. e.g. Fedora enables the bytecode interpreter

Typo in Chapter 'GDM 2.6.0.9'

2005-11-27 Thread Lennon Cook
In the instructions for GDM: - - - chmod -v 644 --prefix=`pkg-config --variable=prefix ORBit-2.0`\ /share/gdm/BuiltInSessions/default.desktop chmod -v 644 --prefix=`pkg-config --variable=prefix ORBit-2.0`\ /share/xsessions/gnome.desktop - - - The '--prefix=' in both lines is superfluous. --

Automating BLFS

2005-11-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I have asked Jeremy and Manuel to consider setting up an automated system to extract instructions from BLFS and creating one or more Makefiles to help users in building packages from BLFS. This process is similar to the jhalfs process. One of the primary advantages is that a proper Makefile could

Re: Automating BLFS

2005-11-27 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 11/27/05 11:39 CST: I have asked Jeremy and Manuel to consider setting up an automated system to extract instructions from BLFS and creating one or more Makefiles to help users in building packages from BLFS. This process is similar to the jhalfs process. One

Very minor typo...Mozilla instructions

2005-11-27 Thread Chris Staub
Create the required component registries to enable multi-user installs. These steps should be preformed by the root user each time a Mozilla add-on is installed. preformed should be performed. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Re: Automating BLFS

2005-11-27 Thread M.Canales.es
El Domingo, 27 de Noviembre de 2005 19:03, Randy McMurchy escribió: I personally don't see the benefit. Are you using customs scripts to build the BLFS packages or are you copy-and-paste directly from the book? Automating LFS is one thing. BLFS is a whole different animal. Agree. For

Re: Typo in Chapter 'GDM 2.6.0.9'

2005-11-27 Thread Lennon Cook
Andrew Benton wrote: If that's true that means you have a /share folder in your root folder and you installed gnome with the --prefix=/ You misunderstand, I think (my fault - superfluous probably wasn't quite the right word in retrospect). I meant that both lines should be `pkg-config

Re: Typo in Chapter 'GDM 2.6.0.9'

2005-11-27 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Lennon Cook wrote: Andrew Benton wrote: If that's true that means you have a /share folder in your root folder and you installed gnome with the --prefix=/ You misunderstand, I think (my fault - superfluous probably wasn't quite the right word in retrospect). I meant that both lines should

Re: Typo in Chapter 'GDM 2.6.0.9'

2005-11-27 Thread Andrew Benton
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: I think superfluous was correct. I bet Andrew just did the same thing I did and assumed you were talking about the configure command. It wasn't until just now I saw that you had written the chmod commands... That's right, I did misread it, I assumed he was talking

Re: Typo in Chapter 'GDM 2.6.0.9'

2005-11-27 Thread Randy McMurchy
Lennon Cook wrote these words on 11/27/05 05:38 CST: In the instructions for GDM: - - - chmod -v 644 --prefix=`pkg-config --variable=prefix ORBit-2.0`\ /share/gdm/BuiltInSessions/default.desktop chmod -v 644 --prefix=`pkg-config --variable=prefix ORBit-2.0`\ /share/xsessions/gnome.desktop