M.Canales.es wrote:
El Domingo, 30 de Abril de 2006 21:27, DJ Lucas escribió:
As far as the blank pages, I hadn't noticed them earlier. They appear
in the gnome section as well, but the rendered book only includes the
second and third as far as I can tell...that's odd.
That should be
Hi,
I've just finished installing OOo-2.0.2 with a system-installed
firefox (version 1.0.7).
It hasn't been a smooth sailing, so I thought I'd share my experience,
and perhaps get some insight from anyone who's already done it
(perhaps in a better way).
Is there progress on the subject beyond
Alon Keren wrote:
Hi,
I've just finished installing OOo-2.0.2 with a system-installed
firefox (version 1.0.7).
It hasn't been a smooth sailing, so I thought I'd share my experience,
and perhaps get some insight from anyone who's already done it
(perhaps in a better way).
Is there progress on
On 4/30/06, Archaic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:36:01PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
If no one is against this, I will add ed to the required dependencies of Xorg.
Aaak! Wouldn't a sed to use sed be preferred? Why anyone is still
relying on ed is beyond me.
I'm really
On 4/27/06, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In dividing the Xorg-7 instructions, I noticed (well I probably always
knew it was close) that all three packages have almost the same
post-install instructions. The exception is the installed program name
called for creating the config file. Is
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I trimmed way too much, and I don't know where to jump in, but here's
my contribution.
Dan, we have made a decision on this and moved on. If there are issues,
we will revisit, but nothing has come up yet.
-- Bruce
--
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 05/02/06 10:43 CST:
Dan, we have made a decision on this and moved on. If there are issues,
we will revisit, but nothing has come up yet.
I know I said I'd wait until Wednesday to make the changes, but
instead, I'll wait until this evening for anyone to
There is a warning towards the end of the Shadow instructions saying
that you should try to login and su to verify that it works with PAM so
that you can be sure you will be able to log on to your system.
Shouldn't the same suggestion apply if simply rebuilding Shadow with
Cracklib support?
Hi all,
i know, my configuration is somewhat experimental (linux-2.6.16.9, gcc-4.1,
glibc-2.4) but may be there is one who can confirm that there is a problem
that way or even has a solution for it: I have Samba (3.0.22) installed and
have problems when the environment vars LANG and LC_ALL are
