Re: document install nitpicks

David Jensen wrote: > CUPS-1.x.x installs its docs as /usr/share/doc/cups, should be renamed > cups? > > EsounD-0.2.36 tries but fails to install it docs in /usr/share/doc/esound >Attached is a patch that works here. The two install lines for the > docs could then be removed. Alternately ju

Re: Dead Project? (I hope not)

Randy McMurchy wrote: The entire LFS project seems to be in the toilet. Am I the only one that thinks this? No. Am I over reacting? No. Is there anyone else concerned about the health of the project? Yes. -- Despite the fact that I have stopped using it myself, an

document install nitpicks

CUPS-1.x.x installs its docs as /usr/share/doc/cups, should be renamed cups? EsounD-0.2.36 tries but fails to install it docs in /usr/share/doc/esound Attached is a patch that works here. The two install lines for the docs could then be removed. Alternately just rm -rf /usr/share/doc/esou

Re: Dead Project? (I hope not)

Randy McMurchy wrote: The entire LFS project seems to be in the toilet. Am I the only one that thinks this? No. Am I over reacting? No. Is there anyone else concerned about the health of the project? Yes. -- Despite the fact that I have stopped using it myself, an