Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>> The real problem with it is, if we keep holding for every version
>> increment, we'll never get 6.3 out the door.
>
> And do we really need to get 6.3 out of the door? Essentially, without an
> errata
> page, without the team tracking security i
Thomas Trepl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm new to the editors group (or for any other reason) I may have
> missed
> something, so don't hit me too hard for the following question(s).
>
> It seems so that we need to update some directories (files in it) on anduin
> in
> case of a version upda
DJ Lucas wrote:
> The real problem with it is, if we keep holding for every version
> increment, we'll never get 6.3 out the door.
And do we really need to get 6.3 out of the door? Essentially, without an
errata
page, without the team tracking security issues and bugs, it will be just a
snapsh
Hi all,
since I'm new to the editors group (or for any other reason) I may have missed
something, so don't hit me too hard for the following question(s).
It seems so that we need to update some directories (files in it) on anduin in
case of a version update, right? That dir is /srv/ftp/BLFS/..
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 05/07/08 06:37 CST:
>
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 05/07/08 01:20 CST:
>>
>>
>>> Is it time to do a freeze/rc1?
>>>
>> I'm off to work and will look at this, then publish something official
>> this evening.
>>
>
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> The list of missing pakages is not much shorter.
>
> s/not/now/
Heh, funny how one letter makes a huge difference sometimes, eh?
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubs
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The list of missing pakages is not much shorter.
s/not/now/
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> The list of missing pakages is not much shorter.
I sent a message to Justin asking if he wants to collaborate using an
automated system. Waiting to hear from him...
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/f
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Sure. I started rsync manually.
>
> rsync -lprt --delete rsync.osuosl.org::blfs /srv/ftp/BLFS
>
> It is taking some time. I'll let you know what the results were.
The list of missing pakages is not much shorter.
-- Bruce
Missing tripwire-2.4
Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Thanks for offering to help out, Jeremy. :-)
>
No problem. I'd have to re-familiarize myself with the BLFS source and
anduin's configuration...
Bruce, do I have privileges on anduin to do this sort of work?
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 05/08/08 17:05 CST:
>
>> Man, I'm losing it. I'm going to check the archives right now to actually
>> see what was said. I just thought *for sure* that is what I read.
>
> Well, turns out I'm sorta right, for whatever that is worth. :-)
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 05/08/08 17:15 CST:
> There's got to be a way to do this automagically. Either via a cron job
> or a post-commit hook. If you want, I can look into it for you.
Probably for 95% of the packages, it could be done. A simple comparison
of book versus repo, and us
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 05/08/08 17:05 CST:
> Man, I'm losing it. I'm going to check the archives right now to actually
> see what was said. I just thought *for sure* that is what I read.
Well, turns out I'm sorta right, for whatever that is worth. :-)
On April 1, Justin wrote in to
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 05/08/08 17:00 CST:
>
>> No. I disabled the rsync some time ago as the last time the master was
>> updated
>> was sometime in December. If Justin's server gets updated, I can easily
>> re-enable the rsync.
>
> Well, I'll be darned. I t
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 05/08/08 17:05 CST:
>
>> At this point, why not just make anduin your master ftp server?
>
> The whole problem was that, as a whole, the BLFS editing team
> failed to do what we were supposed to (make updates on Anduin
> after updating
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 05/08/08 17:05 CST:
> At this point, why not just make anduin your master ftp server?
The whole problem was that, as a whole, the BLFS editing team
failed to do what we were supposed to (make updates on Anduin
after updating packages). I was the ringleader of
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 05/08/08 17:00 CST:
> No. I disabled the rsync some time ago as the last time the master was
> updated
> was sometime in December. If Justin's server gets updated, I can easily
> re-enable the rsync.
Well, I'll be darned. I thought I read in the messages back
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> No. I disabled the rsync some time ago as the last time the master was
> updated
> was sometime in December. If Justin's server gets updated, I can easily
> re-enable the rsync.
At this point, why not just make anduin your master ftp server?
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscr
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 05/08/08 16:39 CST:
>> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>
>>> Now I'm going to work on Justin to see if he is around so he'll
>>> fix the main BLFS repo to have a 6.3 repo populated with all the
>>> current SVN packages (as per the current SVN book), t
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 02:31:18PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> Ah, now I see why you didn't like it. I guess it's like the patches
> repo. Most of the time I don't want the whole freaking repo on my
> disk, but every once in a while it's nice to actually have them there.
> After doing checkout
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 05/08/08 16:39 CST:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
>> Now I'm going to work on Justin to see if he is around so he'll
>> fix the main BLFS repo to have a 6.3 repo populated with all the
>> current SVN packages (as per the current SVN book), then create
>> symlinks point
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Now I'm going to work on Justin to see if he is around so he'll
> fix the main BLFS repo to have a 6.3 repo populated with all the
> current SVN packages (as per the current SVN book), then create
> symlinks pointing to that named 6.3rc1, 6.3rc2, and 6.3rc3.
I did create a
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Randy McMurchy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Never looked at it like that. Again, very valid. Looks like I
> need to svn co those auxfiles. My sandbox is just 'BOOK' and I've
> never needed to update the auxfiles so never co them.
Ah, now I see why you didn't like
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 05/08/08 16:21 CST:
> Never looked at it like that. Again, very valid. Looks like I
> need to svn co those auxfiles. My sandbox is just 'BOOK' and
Actually, I've got the Bootscripts and the edguide as well.
Fetching auxfiles now. :-)
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bog
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 05/08/08 13:52 CST:
> For mozconfig files, it's not that big of an issue. However, suppose
> we release BLFS-6.3 with firefox-2.0.0.14. After branching off 6.3, we
> change the svn firefox to use a different --enable-* option, say for
> cairo. If the files on and
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:11:58AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> I explained in great detail why this change was made and why there are
> two copies of everything (maintaining URLs):
>
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2008-April/018562.html
>
> How it's updated is very simple.
Hi all,
when i do a "make pdf" i get
bash-3.2$ make pdf
Validating the book...
Generating FO file...
warning: failed to load external entity "tmp/blfs-pdf.xml"
unable to parse tmp/blfs-pdf.xml
make: *** [tmp/blfs-pdf.fo] Fehler 6
bash-3.2$
I found that in section $(RENDERTMP)/blfs-pdf.fo the xs
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Randy McMurchy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 05/08/08 13:11 CST:
>
>> I'm sorry this has inconvenienced you so much, but it addresses a real
>> problem.
>
> It doesn't inconvenience me as I know how to create a .mozconfig
> file on
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 05/08/08 13:11 CST:
> I'm sorry this has inconvenienced you so much, but it addresses a real
> problem.
It doesn't inconvenience me as I know how to create a .mozconfig
file on my own to build Firefox. :-)
Though I still don't know what the real problem was (a
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Randy McMurchy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote these words on 05/08/08 11:53 CST:
>> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 03:50:44PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>> Actually, I just ran across another one...and it's fixed now...I think.
>>> auxfiles/firefox-2.0.0.14-moz
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 05/07/08 06:37 CST:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 05/07/08 01:20 CST:
>
>> Is it time to do a freeze/rc1?
>
> I'm off to work and will look at this, then publish something official
> this evening.
Didn't get around to it yesterday. I'll update Rsync today
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 05/08/08 11:53 CST:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 03:50:44PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> Actually, I just ran across another one...and it's fixed now...I think.
>> auxfiles/firefox-2.0.0.14-mozconfig. Anything special I need to do with
>> that or the wget and md5 files
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 03:50:44PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I just ran across another one...and it's fixed now...I think.
>> auxfiles/firefox-2.0.0.14-mozconfig. Anything special I need to do with
>> that or the
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 03:50:44PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> Actually, I just ran across another one...and it's fixed now...I think.
> auxfiles/firefox-2.0.0.14-mozconfig. Anything special I need to do with
> that or the wget and md5 files?
>
Sorry, didn't get around to replying to this ear
34 matches
Mail list logo
