I have also been fighting with this. I add:
enable_static=no
pic_mode=yes
to /usr/share/config.site. And despite this a lot of packages install static
libraries. I don't install the static versions of zlib or libbz2. I also
build with:
--fatal-warnings --warn-shared-textrel
in gcc's specs, whic
You STFU, and I need premissions back.
William
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Uwe Düffert wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, William Immendorf wrote:
>
>> My premission needs to be back.
> ?!? Oh, no. As I am still reading that shit you unfortunately still have
> too much of it... Don't like blackl
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, William Immendorf wrote:
> My premission needs to be back.
?!? Oh, no. As I am still reading that shit you unfortunately still have
too much of it... Don't like blacklisting people at all, but on the other
hand I never met someone as observationally challenged as you before.
I was gonna, but I can't even edit wiki pages.
My premission needs to be back.
William
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Robert Connolly
wrote:
> I didn't read this whole thread, but if I were in Williams place I would just
> use the wiki page for the new version of Speex.
>
> robert
>
> --
> ht
Some of you will have noticed that I'm commenting about how to
prevent static libraries being built when I make updates - at least,
where it is feasible - suppressing static libs for other packages
such as cdparanoia will best be covered in the wiki ("let it
install, then rip them out"). If you d
I didn't read this whole thread, but if I were in Williams place I would just
use the wiki page for the new version of Speex.
robert
pgpJE5x9Pnv5t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscr
For new readers: with the release fo firefox3, building the browser
app ('firefox') does not install pkgconfig files. Building it as
xulrunner does; you then have to build it again as firefox, with a
switch pointing to the xulrunner sdk libs (fortunately, the second
build is quick).
We had some
But I still want to help out.
William
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Randy McMurchy
wrote:
> William Immendorf wrote these words on 02/11/09 16:53 CST:
>> I am a autistic 12 year old who loves computer.
>
> Well that explains things. Please go away and come back after you've
> grown up and can
William Immendorf wrote these words on 02/11/09 16:53 CST:
> I am a autistic 12 year old who loves computer.
Well that explains things. Please go away and come back after you've
grown up and can actually help this community.
At this point...
*plonk*
And in case you're not sure what that means:
Because everyone should know why Speex 1.2rc1 should be in BLFS 6.4.
William
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Randy McMurchy
wrote:
> William Immendorf wrote these words on 02/11/09 07:18 CST:
>> Here are the reasons why Speex 1.2rc1 should be used in BLFS 6.4:
>
> You've already (several times
William Immendorf wrote these words on 02/11/09 07:18 CST:
> Here are the reasons why Speex 1.2rc1 should be used in BLFS 6.4:
You've already (several times now) made your preference clear using
the Trac system.
Why do you now feel the need to spam the -dev list with the same
information?
--
Ra
BLFS,
Here are the reasons why Speex 1.2rc1 should be used in BLFS 6.4:
1. According to Speex's download page, they highly recommend the
unstable releases. I think we should trust Speex's upstream here. See
http://www.speex.org/downloads/ for why.
2. Starting with 1.2beta3, all of the non codec
12 matches
Mail list logo
