I've made the suggested changes and the patch is attached, hopefully it
should be more approvable. I couldn't think of a clean way to sed gpg
with gpg2, there doesn't seem to be anything predictable about all of
the occurances of the command gpg.
Index: BOOK/basicnet/mailnews/mutt.xml
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:50:41AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> We need to work out better text for the patch. Not addressed is
> the situation where one has gpg and gpg2 installed, where the
> need to create the symlink is not there.
I figured that if one were to have gpg they would not be in t
Guy Dalziel wrote:
> The mutt page mentions the use of GnuPG 2, however it fails to mention
> the need for gpg2 to be symlinked to gpg in order for the imported
> commands to work. The attached patch corrects this.
We need to work out better text for the patch. Not addressed is
the situation where
The mutt page mentions the use of GnuPG 2, however it fails to mention
the need for gpg2 to be symlinked to gpg in order for the imported
commands to work. The attached patch corrects this.
Index: BOOK/basicnet/mailnews/mutt.xml
===
--
