> 1. Give up. Point people to cblfs, or change the blfs wiki
> so that anyone can post again. [ not my preferred solution,
> but
Cblfs does have its benefits, it feels more up-to-date but at the
expense of a "known good" package set at any given point in time.
When building LFS/BLFS I prefer BLF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote these words on 07/17/09 21:57 CST:
>> The reason for the CONFIGPARMS was to give the end user an easier way of
>> cutting and pasting all the optional parameters during the build. Maybe
>> the single option
> LFS 6.4 and 6.5 use completely different GCC versions. When we compile
> things in BLFS we are validating that software X will compile under X
> conditions. If the said piece of software does not work under 6.4 and
> we're supporting 6.5, then it doesn't tell us anything, it only gives
> cause to
2009/7/20 Tobias Gasser :
> Ken Moffat schrieb:
>
>> 1. Create a branch for 6.4 Something needs to be done to get it to show up
>> on the website, and to render. I've no idea what that involves.
>
> as 6.5 will be released pretty soon, i don't see the necessity for a 6.4
> branch. some will use 6
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:37:06AM -0700, Craig Jackson wrote:
> Reporting bugs against BLFS-SVN still has value for the
> LFS-6.5/BLFS-6.5 releases, correct?
LFS 6.4 and 6.5 use completely different GCC versions. When we compile
things in BLFS we are validating that software X will compile under
> I'm afraid that 6.4 may no longer be supported as far as BLFS goes. There
> is just too much work involved to release something that will put us even
> further behind. Therefore, although we're still in the process of debating
> it, BLFS-SVN may skip a version and go straight to 6.5. If you plan
Craig Jackson wrote:
> Not sure if this is fixed upstream...
>
> Looks like the G_GNUC_FUNCTION macro is deprecated. Here is the
> workaround I used to get it to compile:
>
> for f in `grep -H -r -s "G_GNUC_FUNCTION" * | cut -d: -f1`; do sed -i
> "s/G_GNUC_FUNCTION/G_STRFUNC/g" $f; done
>
> BLFS D
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 07:58:07AM -0500, krendosha...@dementedfury.org wrote:
> I've just ordered a D-Link DIR-655 to replace it, hopefully it should be
> here soon.
It arrived this morning and seems to be working pretty well, I've now
got my network back. Now I can get some work done.
pgpnWN3U
Craig Jackson wrote:
> I get the following error output when using LFS-6.4 and
> BLFS-SVN-20090718 to compile libbonobo-2.18.0:
I'm afraid that 6.4 may no longer be supported as far as BLFS goes. There
is just too much work involved to release something that will put us even
further behind. Theref
