--- On Sat, 7/31/10, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> That should probably change now. I'm not sure any active
> developers
> are using 6.5. I am open to suggestions, but I feel BLFS
> may need
> to just simply target the LFS Development book. Anybody who
> could
> contribute some alternate ideas would
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 23:16, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 08:56 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I know we ended the discussion about keeping KDE 3.5.10 a long time ago, but
>> I just heard about some unofficial KDE 3.5 branch, called KDE Trinity.
>> They've released
>> a 3.5.11 of KDE 3
On 06/14/2010 08:56 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know we ended the discussion about keeping KDE 3.5.10 a long time ago, but
> I just heard about some unofficial KDE 3.5 branch, called KDE Trinity.
> They've released
> a 3.5.11 of KDE 3, and I think they're trying to port it to use Qt4.
> I
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 07:33:01PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> That should probably change now. I'm not sure any active developers
> are using 6.5. I am open to suggestions, but I feel BLFS may need
> to just simply target the LFS Development book. Anybody who could
> contribute some alternate i
On 31 July 2010 01:33, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> Just for the record, BLFS is still targetted at LFS-6.5, so build
>> instructions
>> should be appropriate to that version.
>
> That should probably change now. I'm not sure any active developers
> are using 6.5. I am open to
