On 07/30/2011 06:22 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 07/29/2011 07:29 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> I am open to suggestions, let the community speak out! C'mon, we need
>> to keep BLFS alive!
>
> So I grabbed the SVN, which produced nothing interesting in the top
> level directory, guessed I wanted "boo
Rob Landley wrote:
> So I grabbed the SVN, which produced nothing interesting in the top
> level directory, guessed I wanted "book", there was a readme in there,
> told me I could run make, and I did. It sat there for three minutes
> "validating the book" before I gave up and killed it.
It's a
Rob Landley wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, got buried in work. This has been sitting in my drafts
> folder all week.
>
> On 07/21/2011 05:21 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> On 7/21/2011 2:13 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> Yes, there are very good reasons. Additionally, using the most recent
>> release of
On 07/29/2011 07:29 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I am open to suggestions, let the community speak out! C'mon, we need
> to keep BLFS alive!
So I grabbed the SVN, which produced nothing interesting in the top
level directory, guessed I wanted "book", there was a readme in there,
told me I could ru
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:21:35AM -0700, Qrux wrote:
>
> In that example, I could see the Desktop "path" including X, Gnome, KDE,
> Sound, Video, etc. The production server path wouldn't include compilation
> tools, but would include different production-related server packages
> (tcpwrappers
Sorry for the delay, got buried in work. This has been sitting in my drafts
folder all week.
On 07/21/2011 05:21 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> On 7/21/2011 2:13 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>
>> So the message to people new the project is they have two choices:
>>
>> 1) Try the latest known-good release
Howdy, all.
"Long time user, first-time poster."
I've used [a-z]LFS in a HPC research environment. Now I'm considering using it
to deploy a Xen cluster (which is a great marriage of the "slimness" of LFS,
the idea of virtualization, and the new Xen support in the mainline kernel).
(I
On 30/07/11 21:20, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> On Saturday 30 July 2011 02:29:55 Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> ...
>> I was hoping that my response to your post would encourage additional
>> responses. Actually, I am surprised that it has not. All that has
>> happened is additional packages have been added t
On Saturday 30 July 2011 02:29:55 Randy McMurchy wrote:
> ...
> I was hoping that my response to your post would encourage additional
> responses. Actually, I am surprised that it has not. All that has
> happened is additional packages have been added to the book which is
> the opposite of where y
Op 30-07-11 02:29, Randy McMurchy schreef:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 07/21/11 17:21 CST:
>> Thanks Rob, for your insightful and thoughtful comments. I have
>> read them all. Let's continue to discuss. I know I can commit some
>> time, DJ checks in now and then, Wayne updates occasionall
10 matches
Mail list logo
