Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1

2012-02-23 Thread Andrew Benton
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:30:22 + Ken Moffat wrote: > I prefer not to recreate docs when I can just download them, but > it's your call. Ok, we'll do that then. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See t

Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1

2012-02-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 23/2/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quinta-feira, 23 de Fevereiro de 2012, 16:42 > Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 06:52:12PM +, Andrew Benton > wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012

Re: [blfs-dev] Phonon and its backends

2012-02-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ragnar Thomsen wrote: > What are the exact definitions of recommended and > optional dependencies? There aren't really any exact definitions. Required dependencies are those where the package won't build without or has vastly reduced functionality. Recommended is the editor's call. Basicall

Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1

2012-02-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 23/2/12, Andrew Benton escreveu: > De: Andrew Benton > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1 > Para: blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org > Data: Quinta-feira, 23 de Fevereiro de 2012, 15:52 > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:37:19 -0800 > (PST) > Fernando de Oliveira > wrote: > > > Well, I do instal

Re: [blfs-dev] Phonon and its backends

2012-02-23 Thread Ragnar Thomsen
>On Wed Feb 22 12:15:54 MST 2012, Ken Moffat wrote: >I don't have time to render this (too busy with those gnome >packages), but a couple of things I noticed from a quick look at it: > >1. You've tagged the packages as tested with LFS-6.7. Is that what >you are really using ? If it is, I'm afrai

Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1

2012-02-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 06:52:12PM +, Andrew Benton wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:37:19 -0800 (PST) >> Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >>> Well, I do install them from downloaded ones, it is easier and no necessity >>> of asciidoc. >> Do you have something against asciid

Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1

2012-02-23 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 06:52:12PM +, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:37:19 -0800 (PST) > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > > Well, I do install them from downloaded ones, it is easier and no necessity > > of asciidoc. > > Do you have something against asciidoc? It's just one do

Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1

2012-02-23 Thread Andrew Benton
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:37:19 -0800 (PST) Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Well, I do install them from downloaded ones, it is easier and no necessity > of asciidoc. Do you have something against asciidoc? It's just one download as opposed to the 2 that you suggest. Also, it can be used by other pa

Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1

2012-02-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 23/2/12, Andrew Benton escreveu: > De: Andrew Benton > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1 > Para: blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org > Data: Quinta-feira, 23 de Fevereiro de 2012, 14:20 > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:27:12 -0800 > (PST) > Fernando de Oliveira > wrote: > > > LFS "7.0 svn", 6

Re: [blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1

2012-02-23 Thread Andrew Benton
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:27:12 -0800 (PST) Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > LFS "7.0 svn", 6.8, 6.7, 6.5. > > I noticed that BLFS does not install any more git-manpages-1.7.9.1.tar.gz and > git-htmldocs-1.7.9.1.tar.gz Installing the manpages requires asciidoc which is not in the book. It is listed

Re: [blfs-dev] imagemagick-6.7.5-6

2012-02-23 Thread Baho Utot
On 02/23/2012 12:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> LFS "7.0 svn", 6.8, 6.7, 6.5. >> >> I believe "make install" should be referenced once, not twice in BLFS: >> >> Now, as the root user: >> >> make install >> >> And then, as the root user: >> >> make install > LOL. Yes it

Re: [blfs-dev] imagemagick-6.7.5-6

2012-02-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > LFS "7.0 svn", 6.8, 6.7, 6.5. > > I believe "make install" should be referenced once, not twice in BLFS: > > Now, as the root user: > > make install > > And then, as the root user: > > make install LOL. Yes it should. I suppose we really, really wanted to have

[blfs-dev] imagemagick-6.7.5-6

2012-02-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
LFS "7.0 svn", 6.8, 6.7, 6.5. I believe "make install" should be referenced once, not twice in BLFS: >> Now, as the root user: make install And then, as the root user: make install And, if you built PerlMagick, still as the root user: make -C PerlMagick install >> []s, Fernando -- http:

Re: [blfs-dev] subversion-1.7.3 (ande previous one)

2012-02-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 23/2/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] subversion-1.7.3 (ande previous one) > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quinta-feira, 23 de Fevereiro de 2012, 13:25 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > LFS "7.0 svn", 6.8, 6.7, 6.5. > > > > ./configure --pr

[blfs-dev] git-1.7.9.1

2012-02-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
LFS "7.0 svn", 6.8, 6.7, 6.5. I noticed that BLFS does not install any more git-manpages-1.7.9.1.tar.gz and git-htmldocs-1.7.9.1.tar.gz []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above informatio

Re: [blfs-dev] subversion-1.7.3 (ande previous one)

2012-02-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > LFS "7.0 svn", 6.8, 6.7, 6.5. > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-neon=/usr > > Only Perl and Python bindings. > > Not only apr (1.4.6) but also apr-util (1.4.1) required. Although apr is not > in the book, it is cited, so... > > Perhaps I am missing some configu

[blfs-dev] subversion-1.7.3 (ande previous one)

2012-02-23 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
LFS "7.0 svn", 6.8, 6.7, 6.5. ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-neon=/usr Only Perl and Python bindings. Not only apr (1.4.6) but also apr-util (1.4.1) required. Although apr is not in the book, it is cited, so... Perhaps I am missing some configure switch. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromsc

Re: [blfs-dev] Rox Filer

2012-02-23 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:01:20PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Andrew Benton wrote: > > > > Thanks. I need some advice about where to put it in the book. Somewhere > > in the xsoft seems appropriate, but it's not an office program (is the > > gimp an office program?) or a web browser or an interne