On 13.09.2012 10:18, Kenno Han wrote:
I agree with this argument.
Also, I am here to add more reason on that.
Not only that the download speed is low, it is also hard
for downloading process with scripts and text-based browser/downloader.
I think that we should even avoid using javascripted
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Kenno Han wrote:
I agree with this argument.
Also, I am here to add more reason on that.
Not only that the download speed is low, it is also hard
for downloading process with scripts and text-based browser/downloader.
I have no problems downloading from sourceforge with
Armin K. wrote:
On 13.09.2012 10:18, Kenno Han wrote:
I agree with this argument.
Also, I am here to add more reason on that.
Not only that the download speed is low, it is also hard
for downloading process with scripts and text-based browser/downloader.
I think that we should even avoid
Em 11-09-2012 21:08, Ken Moffat escreveu:
I'm about to step back from editing BLFS for a while. This year,
I've spent far too much time on it, and the other things that I put
aside must now take priority. At the moment, I'm preparing one of
my irregular lists of what I've built, and in what
Em 12-09-2012 18:29, Randy McMurchy escreveu:
I am glad to hearing from you again.
Was worried after your last message telling about the tornado, and every
day thought about enquiring if all went well.
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
I just updated seamonkey but have a curious observation about testing.
I generally do LFS/BLFS building and testing via ssh on a development
system separate from my day-to-day system. Most tests build and work
fine that way, including gui applications.
I built seamonkey-2.12.1 and ran it. I
