Re: [blfs-dev] Tag LFS 7.3 (built or executed properly)

2013-05-27 Thread Fernando
Em 26-05-2013 19:52, Fernando escreveu: > 23. Gvfs-1.14.2 (works) 24. nss-3.14.3 (builds) 25. libevent-2.0.21 (builds) 26. libvpx-1.1.0 (builds) -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the ab

Re: [blfs-dev] libpng 1.6 and firefox

2013-05-27 Thread Fernando
# cat /etc/lfs-release SVN-20130512 Could not build Firefox-21.0 with system libpng-1.6.2. xzgrep libpng /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/xulrunner-21.0-Armin-blfs-2013.05.27-13h35m49s.log.xz configure: error: --with-system-png won't work because the system's libpng doesn't have APNG support But i

[blfs-dev] Firefox-21.0: some directories changed

2013-05-27 Thread Fernando
Two difficulties found: One is not relevant for the book: 1. I used to install the language pack in: /usr/lib/firefox-$version/extensions Did not work. Now, it works in: /usr/lib/firefox-$version/browser/extensions Following might be relevant for the book: 2. mozicon128.png is now in: /u

Re: [blfs-dev] RFC: Which GNOME packages to remove and which ones to keep?

2013-05-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > From my quick look, this is what I came with. I want to keep the > following packages in the book - none of them has hard dep on Systemd. Everything looks reasonable. If issues arise, we can always add it back. > D11197 x/lib/gtkmm3.xml This is the only thing

[blfs-dev] RFC: Which GNOME packages to remove and which ones to keep?

2013-05-27 Thread Armin K.
From my quick look, this is what I came with. I want to keep the following packages in the book - none of them has hard dep on Systemd. Base: gobject-introspection-1.34.2 Vala-0.18.1 gsettings-desktop-schemas-3.6.1 AccountsService-0.6.31 - LightDM will use it. polkit-gnome-0.105 - Any desktop n

[blfs-dev] Removal of GNOME packages

2013-05-27 Thread Armin K.
Hi, with Systemd branch created, I'd like to remove all (most) of GNOME Desktop related packages from standard BLFS and keep most of the apps so we don't hold upgrades for low level libraries because of it. Any obligations? We can replace GNOME with some lighter alternative like E17 or LXDE if