[blfs-dev] lvm2

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I am trying to update lvm2 and am running into a bit of trouble with the tests. The configure and make complete with out issue. I did a make install to a DESTDIR and that was OK too. The problem is 'make check'. If I run as a normal user, all the tests fail with what looks like permission pr

Re: [blfs-dev] GnuPG

2013-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:12:52AM +0200, Armin K. wrote: > > GNOME Stuff (seahorse, gcr) and gpgme works fine with 2.x version. > mitkrb uses it only for key verification which should work fine. Dunno > about mutt, but it works just fine with Thunderbird and engimail. I have to admit that I gav

Re: [blfs-dev] GnuPG

2013-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 08/23/2013 01:09 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > That's OK with me. A quick check shows perl-modules, seahorse, gcr, > mutt, mitkrb, and gpgme referencing gunpg. If they can use gnupg2 > instead, then we can remove it. > > However, it is still being maintained. The last update was less than a

Re: [blfs-dev] GnuPG

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 08/23/2013 12:40 AM, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: >> Author: bdubbs >> Date: Thu Aug 22 15:40:33 2013 >> New Revision: 11674 >> >> Log: >> Update to gnupg-2.0.21. > > Can we make this one default and ditch 1.x version? Arch has done that > too. Requires symlinks for

[blfs-dev] GnuPG

2013-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 08/23/2013 12:40 AM, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: > Author: bdubbs > Date: Thu Aug 22 15:40:33 2013 > New Revision: 11674 > > Log: > Update to gnupg-2.0.21. Can we make this one default and ditch 1.x version? Arch has done that too. Requires symlinks for gpgv and gpg to respective

Re: [blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 04:10:58PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > I also built strace-4.8 fine against linux-3.10, but did so under > uClibc. > I think it's a glibc problem - it's acquired something that was already in the kernel headers. But I may well have misunderstood. I'm puzzled that t

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11672 - trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 08/22/2013 10:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> kre...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: >>> Author: krejzi >>> Date: Thu Aug 22 13:45:41 2013 >>> New Revision: 11672 >>> >>> Log: >>> minor acl fixes. >>> >>> Modified: >>> trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/acl.xml >>> trunk/BOOK

Re: [blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-22 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/22/2013 01:42:11 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:06:44PM +0200, Armin K. wrote: > > On 08/22/2013 04:39 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > Just a note that strace-4.8 doesn't build with the current kernel > > > headers. Noted on the strace list on 13th August, but they don't > >

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11672 - trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security

2013-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 08/22/2013 10:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > kre...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: >> Author: krejzi >> Date: Thu Aug 22 13:45:41 2013 >> New Revision: 11672 >> >> Log: >> minor acl fixes. >> >> Modified: >> trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/acl.xml >> trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/attr.xml >> >

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11672 - trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
kre...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: > Author: krejzi > Date: Thu Aug 22 13:45:41 2013 > New Revision: 11672 > > Log: > minor acl fixes. > > Modified: > trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/acl.xml > trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/attr.xml > amp; > -chmod -v 755 /usr/lib/libattr.so.1.1.0 && > +chmo

Re: [blfs-dev] acl

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 08/22/2013 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> I just ran into a minor problem, but can't figure out how to best fix it >>> in the book. acl installs /usr/lib/libacl.la. This file has the line: >>> >>> dependency_libs=' /usr/usr/lib/libattr.la' >>> >>> This

Re: [blfs-dev] acl

2013-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 08/22/2013 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I just ran into a minor problem, but can't figure out how to best fix it >> in the book. acl installs /usr/lib/libacl.la. This file has the line: >> >> dependency_libs=' /usr/usr/lib/libattr.la' >> >> This should be /usr/lib/libat

Re: [blfs-dev] acl

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I just ran into a minor problem, but can't figure out how to best fix it > in the book. acl installs /usr/lib/libacl.la. This file has the line: > > dependency_libs=' /usr/usr/lib/libattr.la' > > This should be /usr/lib/libattr.la. I don't see what is making this > line. Th

[blfs-dev] acl

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I just ran into a minor problem, but can't figure out how to best fix it in the book. acl installs /usr/lib/libacl.la. This file has the line: dependency_libs=' /usr/usr/lib/libattr.la' This should be /usr/lib/libattr.la. I don't see what is making this line. The obvious fix is to run a sed

Re: [blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 22.8.2013 20:42, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:06:44PM +0200, Armin K. wrote: >> On 08/22/2013 04:39 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >>> Just a note that strace-4.8 doesn't build with the current kernel >>> headers. Noted on the strace list on 13th August, but they don't >>> seem to ha

Re: [blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:06:44PM +0200, Armin K. wrote: > On 08/22/2013 04:39 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > Just a note that strace-4.8 doesn't build with the current kernel > > headers. Noted on the strace list on 13th August, but they don't > > seem to have a fix. This looks as if something in t

[blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
Just a note that strace-4.8 doesn't build with the current kernel headers. Noted on the strace list on 13th August, but they don't seem to have a fix. This looks as if something in the 3.10.x stable series broke it. Error is - In file included from process.c:66:0: /usr/include/linux/ptrace.h:5

Re: [blfs-dev] SBUs - was Re: #3982: Firefox-23.0.1/Xulrunner-23.0.1

2013-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:45:03AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 21-08-2013 19:48, Ken Moffat escreveu: > > I will write down things that I think. I may be wrong, so, please tell > me, if I am. > > SBU is good, necessary. SBU can never be trusted completely. Can never > be accurate. Thi

Re: [blfs-dev] Two difficulties (one in all versions)

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Note too that when we are doing a copy from a browser, that it needs to >> remove html, so it may be a browser issue. > > It was not a big deal, but was worth mentioning. Now, I have better > understanding; before, it was a mystery. > > Again, perhaps, a comment or n

Re: [blfs-dev] Certificate Authorities Certificates

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Three points: > > First one, I could do, but the other ones, I would prefer, either is a > too important decision or it is too big for me, but if necessary, can try. > > 1. Minor one, but noticed it, yesterday: > > In the book, > cleaning: rm -r certs BLFS-ca-bundle* >

Re: [blfs-dev] SBUs - was Re: #3982: Firefox-23.0.1/Xulrunner-23.0.1

2013-08-22 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 21-08-2013 19:48, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 01:49:17PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >> All 5 VMs finished. They run with 4 CPU's, are i686. Two, as I said >> before, 1GB RAM, running in other host, 3 have 1.5GB, running on this >> host that have many other things, i

Re: [blfs-dev] Two difficulties (one in all versions)

2013-08-22 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 21-08-2013 19:18, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Did not know if sending here, to lfs -dev or to blfs -support. >> >> 1. Happened with lfs-7.2,7.3 (both svn) and now with 7.4-rc1. >> >> ... as host), after logout and umount, had to reboot the system >> $ grep tty /etc/gr

[blfs-dev] Certificate Authorities Certificates

2013-08-22 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Three points: First one, I could do, but the other ones, I would prefer, either is a too important decision or it is too big for me, but if necessary, can try. 1. Minor one, but noticed it, yesterday: In the book, cleaning: rm -r certs BLFS-ca-bundle* However, certdata.txt is left. Is it intent