Randy McMurchy wrote:
I don't understand why the .so symlinks linked to the .so.version
file needs to be in both /usr/lib and /lib.
I don't either. The .so symlinks (no version) are used only at linking time.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Well, then, I suppose the LFS gang needs to all get on the same page.
The Readline and Shadow instructions don't agree with what you say
above.
All the linker scripts that come with GNU binutils search /lib before
/usr/lib; if you put a .so (non-versioned) symlink into /lib,
Jim Gifford wrote:
http://ftp.jg555.com/udev/blfs-udev-config-1.rules. This file would be
copied to /etc/udev/rules.d/30-blfs.rules.
My suggestion would be to not bundle them into a single file, but rather
to actually have the reader create a file with the few lines necessary
for each subsystem
Jeremy Utley wrote:
Sounds good to me. I'm all for FHS compliance wherever it's possible to
do so.
Agreed here.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
