, the performance will be a bit poor (the server is a
> 800MHz fanless device on a home-DSL).
>
> Comments and suggestions will be very welcome!
>
>
Maybe you should merge your work with LFScript, which tries to do the
same thing but has been around for much longer :)
Then the result
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 02:14, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 02:17 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 14:30, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>> On 11/28/2010 12:55 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I finally have some working c
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 19:39, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 12:55 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I finally have some working cmake scripts for Trinity, courtesy of
>> samelian on Freenode, since we do not want to use a crappy and old
>> autoconf.
>
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 15:17, Robert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 14:30, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> On 11/28/2010 12:55 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I finally have some working cmake scripts for Trinity, courtesy of
>>> samelian on Freen
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 14:30, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 12:55 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I finally have some working cmake scripts for Trinity, courtesy of
>> samelian on Freenode, since we do not want to use a crappy and old
>> autoconf.
>
Hi all,
I finally have some working cmake scripts for Trinity, courtesy of
samelian on Freenode, since we do not want to use a crappy and old
autoconf.
I'm testing them right now, which brings me to another subject: Will
cmake be included into BLFS?
--
later, Robert Xu
--
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:45, DJ Lucas wrote:
> "Robert Xu" wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:13, DJ Lucas
>>wrote:
>>> On 11/21/2010 06:53 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>>> DJ Lucas wrote these words on 11/21/10 17:52 CST:
>>>>>
That way we could set the PATH to it, use it to install Trinity, then
remove the directory in /opt.
You can find out more here:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/wiki/bin/view/Developers/HowToBuild
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 18:04, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:00:05PM -0400, Robert Xu wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 09:57, Randy McMurchy
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Sections 26-28: KDE
>> > Not even a clue what to do here. The book versio
h of what is written above.
>
> --
> Randy
>
> rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
> [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
> 08:09:01 up 2 days, 14:03, 1 user, load average: 0.75, 0.33, 0.21
--
later, Robert Xu
sitive that KDE still relies on that obsolete HAL.
As for PolicyKit and DeviceKit, KDE has been smart enough to obsolete
them in favor of newer ones.
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
See here for what the maintainer uses for
config options: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::294
Tarballs are here:
http://mirror.its.uidaho.edu/pub/trinity/releases/3.5.12/downloads.html
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sep 30, 2010, at 1:37, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 09/29/2010 07:50 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 18:16, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:03:41AM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>>> While I'm not personally a fan of KDE/QT, it seems to me
call cmake obnoxious for two reasons - the less-important is
> that it reinvents the wheel for us, the more important is that it
> appeared to enforce static libs as well as shared (can you say
> vulnerability?).
ew, cmake. I wish that KDE never used it.
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
os have moved
> on to cdrkit, I believe - last time I looked, that used cmake
> to configure it so I've given it a wide berth..
>
openSUSE allows users to use the latest cdrtools; See their
Base:System repository.
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 22:40, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Robert Xu wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 17:14, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Robert Xu wrote:
>>>
>>>> For the KDE-4 stuff, would you mind if I upgraded that to 4.5?
>>> No. Go ahead.
>>>
>
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 17:14, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Robert Xu wrote:
>
>> For the KDE-4 stuff, would you mind if I upgraded that to 4.5?
>
> No. Go ahead.
>
>> Probably a good idea.
>> Just the little problem of I can't write to the BLFS wiki...
>
> Sen
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>> On 06/14/2010 08:56 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I know we ended the discussion about keeping KDE 3.5.10 a long time ago, but
>>> I just heard about some unofficial KD
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 23:16, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 08:56 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I know we ended the discussion about keeping KDE 3.5.10 a long time ago, but
>> I just heard about some unofficial KDE 3.5 branch, called KDE Trinity.
>> Th
Hi all,
Can someone update the version of GCC on BLFS to match LFS's?
As far as I know, the build instructions should be the same.
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
E to their KDE 3.5.11? maybe? Or should we just stick
with what we have?
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:55, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On 10 March 2010 11:35, Robert Xu wrote:
>
>
>> That's probably a good idea, in the end. Let's just keep kde3. The
>> farthest I go for databases in kde is sqlite.
>>
>> --
> That's fine provid
On Dec 8, 2009, at 21:55, William Immendorf
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>> Hi, I'm pretty new here, and I just wanted to say Thunderbird was
>> released today (that's the reason i posted to this thread). Do you
>> have an exac
Hi, I'm pretty new here, and I just wanted to say Thunderbird was
released today (that's the reason i posted to this thread). Do you
have an exact date of when you'll update to thunderbird 3?
On Dec 8, 2009, at 0:58, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 12/07/2009 11:11 PM, Treah Blade wrote:
>> The current ve
24 matches
Mail list logo
