Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Randy McMurchy wrote: Next thing is that my current setup does not have a userspace tool setup to *automatically* mount the devices, though since I just use the regular mount command (not pmount), I should be able to just mount manually using the fstab file update and mount point creation that HA

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Randy McMurchy
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/31/05 09:26 CST: > key="storage.policy.default.mount_option.iocharset=[replaceme]" > type="bool">true > key="storage.policy.default.mount_option.codepage=[replaceme]" > type="bool">true This stuff here is probably best put into a configuration fil

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Randy McMurchy
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/31/05 09:26 CST: > While you are at it, please also configure HAL so that it uses the > "comment=managed" keyword in /etc/fstab OK. I'm changing the existing sed in the book to this: sed -i -e "s/managed and mounts VFAT correctly for > non-ISO-8859-1

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Randy McMurchy
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/31/05 09:52 CST: > Proposal 1: > > [snip adjustment of file] > > This works for all users, and you should be able to test it by plugging > your flash drive in, seeing that the fstab line appears, removing it, > and seeing that the line disappears.

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Randy McMurchy wrote: Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/31/05 09:26 CST: While you are at it, please also configure HAL so that it uses the "comment=managed" keyword in /etc/fstab and mounts VFAT correctly for non-ISO-8859-1 users. Would this perhaps be better in the locale-spec

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Randy McMurchy
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/31/05 09:40 CST: > I was able to circumvent this for hal-0.5.5.1, but I am not sure if this > is OK for the book: > > PYTHON=no ./configure --... > make > make -k install || true I think it would be difficult to explain why we are circumventing the

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Randy McMurchy wrote: Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/31/05 09:26 CST: While you are at it, please also configure HAL so that it uses the "comment=managed" keyword in /etc/fstab and mounts VFAT correctly for non-ISO-8859-1 users. Would this perhaps be better in the locale-spec

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Bruce Dubbs wrote: HAL-0.5.4 lists Python as an optional package, however it seems to be required. I was able to circumvent this for hal-0.5.5.1, but I am not sure if this is OK for the book: PYTHON=no ./configure --... make make -k install || true The resulting HAL is functional enough for

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Randy McMurchy
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/31/05 09:26 CST: > While you are at it, please also configure HAL so that it uses the > "comment=managed" keyword in /etc/fstab and mounts VFAT correctly for > non-ISO-8859-1 users. Would this perhaps be better in the locale-specific page? How can I

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Randy McMurchy wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 12/30/05 21:49 CST: HAL-0.5.4 lists Python as an optional package, however it seems to be required. Indeed, this is correct. Good timing with the report as I was already going to update HAL and juggle the GNOME-Python run-time dependenc

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Randy McMurchy
Joe Ciccone wrote these words on 12/30/05 22:44 CST: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>HAL-0.5.4 lists Python as an optional package, however it seems to be >>required. > > Also if you want to use parts of hal that are written in python like > hal-device-manager you also need dbus to compile its python bindi

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-31 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 12/30/05 21:49 CST: > HAL-0.5.4 lists Python as an optional package, however it seems to be > required. Indeed, this is correct. Good timing with the report as I was already going to update HAL and juggle the GNOME-Python run-time dependency to another section and

Re: [Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-30 Thread Joe Ciccone
Bruce Dubbs wrote: >HAL-0.5.4 lists Python as an optional package, however it seems to be >required. > > Also if you want to use parts of hal that are written in python like hal-device-manager you also need dbus to compile its python bindings. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blf

[Fwd: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN]

2005-12-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Original Message Subject: Correction for HAL-0.5.4 in BLFS SVN Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:45:47 -0600 (Central Standard Time) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HAL-0.5.4 lists Python as an optional package, however it seems to be required. --- Submitted to