On 08/21/2012 01:31 AM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/20/12 12:48 CST:
>> I am going to build a current SVN LFS and use that as my base system for
>> development of BLFS, unless y'all think it would be better to use the
>> last stable LFS. Please let me know.
>
> Pe
On 08/21/2012 01:31 AM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/20/12 12:48 CST:
>> I am going to build a current SVN LFS and use that as my base system for
>> development of BLFS, unless y'all think it would be better to use the
>> last stable LFS. Please let me know.
>
> Pe
Armin K. wrote these words on 08/20/12 18:36 CST:
> Speaking of "lost", both of your introduction mails - one to blfs-dev,
> other to lfs-dev landed in my Spam folder. Same for the reply to
> mariadb. Everything arrived at inbox tough. I am not sure why those 3
> landed in Spam folder.
Probably
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/20/12 18:41 CST:
> Probably because I used two different email clients today. One on Windows
> (current Thunderbird), and one from an old, old, old LFS build using again
> a very old Thunderbird client. I do not know if my SMTP setup is the same
> on the two c
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/20/12 12:48 CST:
> I am going to build a current SVN LFS and use that as my base system for
> development of BLFS, unless y'all think it would be better to use the
> last stable LFS. Please let me know.
Perhaps my question got lost in my introduction. But I w
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:31:51PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/20/12 12:48 CST:
> > I am going to build a current SVN LFS and use that as my base system for
> > development of BLFS, unless y'all think it would be better to use the
> > last stable LFS. Pleas
