Re: [blfs-dev] NTP

2012-02-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Qrux wrote: > It also wasn't the question I was asking. I run ntpd in daemon mode, > because I want it to keep correcting my time after boot, and that's > where the slewing/stepping behavior is relevant. Yes daemon mode is the script default. > * So, I propose turning -x off. OK, I won't make

Re: [blfs-dev] NTP

2012-02-16 Thread Matt Burgess
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 14:13 -0800, Qrux wrote: > On Feb 16, 2012, at 4:38 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:16:12 +, Andrew Benton wrote: > >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:47:37 -0800 > >> Qrux wrote: > >> > >>> * So, I propose turning -x off. > >> > >> I agree, I run ntp

Re: [blfs-dev] NTP

2012-02-16 Thread Qrux
On Feb 16, 2012, at 4:38 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:16:12 +, Andrew Benton wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:47:37 -0800 >> Qrux wrote: >> >>> * So, I propose turning -x off. >> >> I agree, I run ntpd -g >> However, I also think the ntpd bootscript will work fi

Re: [blfs-dev] NTP

2012-02-16 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:16:12 +, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:47:37 -0800 > Qrux wrote: > >> * So, I propose turning -x off. > > I agree, I run ntpd -g > However, I also think the ntpd bootscript will work fine for most > people and for those (like me) who think it shou

Re: [blfs-dev] NTP

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew Benton
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:47:37 -0800 Qrux wrote: > * So, I propose turning -x off. I agree, I run ntpd -g However, I also think the ntpd bootscript will work fine for most people and for those (like me) who think it should be done differently it's trivial to edit the bootscript; your distro,

Re: [blfs-dev] NTP

2012-02-15 Thread Qrux
On Feb 15, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Qrux wrote: >> Is there a reason ntpd is run with -x? >> >> The big slew is nice, but is there a reason it's preferred over the kernel >> discipline? > > When you are booting, there is probably nothing else really depending on > timestamps. W

Re: [blfs-dev] NTP

2012-02-15 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Qrux wrote: > Is there a reason ntpd is run with -x? > > The big slew is nice, but is there a reason it's preferred over the kernel > discipline? When you are booting, there is probably nothing else really depending on timestamps. We might as well just slew the time to be correct. In most ca

[blfs-dev] NTP

2012-02-15 Thread Qrux
Is there a reason ntpd is run with -x? The big slew is nice, but is there a reason it's preferred over the kernel discipline? Q -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page