Pierre Labastie wrote:
> The discussion has shifted to
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/4736
>
> Basically, pax is not really needed, except for passing the LSB tests.
> OTOH, it is a nice utility, which can read and write both cpio and tar
> formats. It lacks the xz compressed format
The discussion has shifted to
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/4736
Basically, pax is not really needed, except for passing the LSB tests.
OTOH, it is a nice utility, which can read and write both cpio and tar
formats. It lacks the xz compressed format, though.
I would say that it doe
Le 13/03/2014 19:43, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>
>> I have found 2 sources for pax:
>> - the mirbsd package, debianised by Debian (the "orig" I put in the
>> ticket). It does not build as is, because the debian "rules" (a makefile
>> actually) are shipped separately, and those
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> I have found 2 sources for pax:
> - the mirbsd package, debianised by Debian (the "orig" I put in the
> ticket). It does not build as is, because the debian "rules" (a makefile
> actually) are shipped separately, and those rules use heavily the debian
> packaging system. S
Hi,
I have found 2 sources for pax:
- the mirbsd package, debianised by Debian (the "orig" I put in the
ticket). It does not build as is, because the debian "rules" (a makefile
actually) are shipped separately, and those rules use heavily the debian
packaging system. So we would first have to m
