CURRENT BLFS: Version SVN-20120320
Compiling TexLive-20110705 with gcc-4.6.2/glibc-2.14.1 has no
difficulties, but when "tex file.tex" is run, a stack overflow occurs.
This is due to a coding glitch in the source. A pointer overrun happens.
The glitch was already present in the old TeTeX-3.0, b
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> On 12/3/2011 8:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Option 1. Use the upstream installer but suggest the use /opt/texlive
>> or some variant instead.
>>
>> Option 3. Use the upstream installer for a base installation and also
>> build the executables and libraries. The LFS built
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> On 12/3/2011 8:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Option 1. Use the upstream installer but suggest the use /opt/texlive
>> or some variant instead.
>>
>> Option 3. Use the upstream installer for a base installation and also
>> build the executables and libraries. The LFS built
On 12/3/2011 8:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Option 1. Use the upstream installer but suggest the use /opt/texlive
> or some variant instead.
>
> Option 3. Use the upstream installer for a base installation and also
> build the executables and libraries. The LFS built executables, and
> optionally
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 20:20:45 -0600
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Option 4. Yet another option is to completely remove TeX from the book.
> It is usually referenced in other packages to rebuild documentation.
> I really doubt many users do that.
>
> Right now I lean towards option 3, but need to get f
I've been looking at texlive and am trying to figure out how to proceed.
The first thing to note is that upstream distribution links their
binaries statically, at least as far as the texlive libraries go (there
are two).
There are a huge number of programs in the livetex distribution. I
don't
