>
> It's been quite a while since I looked at this, but it should be OK for
> older versions of udev. The check occurs before the install, so the
> checks should be against the extracted rules, not the installed rules.
>
yes. sounds reasonable.
but when i did run the "make check" i really got th
Tobias Gasser wrote:
> Am 02.01.2013 13:38, schrieb Tobias Gasser:
>> systemd-196
>>
>>
>> "make check" has a lot of failures due to hard coded
>> "/usr/lib/udev/rules.d" in "src/test/test-udev.c" where as
>> "/lib/udev/rules.d" should be used!
>>
>> easy to fix with a simple sed.
>
>
> meanwhile i
Am 02.01.2013 13:38, schrieb Tobias Gasser:
> systemd-196
>
>
> "make check" has a lot of failures due to hard coded
> "/usr/lib/udev/rules.d" in "src/test/test-udev.c" where as
> "/lib/udev/rules.d" should be used!
>
> easy to fix with a simple sed.
meanwhile i know i was wrong building the orig
systemd-196
"make check" has a lot of failures due to hard coded
"/usr/lib/udev/rules.d" in "src/test/test-udev.c" where as
"/lib/udev/rules.d" should be used!
easy to fix with a simple sed.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq
