Re: Automated package building (LONG)

2006-01-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/30/06 16:15 CST: > > >>>chmod 755 blfsyestest1 >> >> blfs-yes-test1 (readability) > > > Boy, I bet you *hate* the KDE program names. Notice that when they > *do* manage to split the names up a tad for readability, they use >

Re: Automated package building (LONG)

2006-01-30 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/30/06 16:15 CST: >>chmod 755 blfsyestest1 > > blfs-yes-test1 (readability) Boy, I bet you *hate* the KDE program names. Notice that when they *do* manage to split the names up a tad for readability, they use underscores instead of hyphens, which I k

Re: Automated package building (LONG)

2006-01-30 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/30/06 16:15 CST: > [snip all] Thanks for the pointers, Bruce. You obviously read it very carefully, and really didn't expose anything other than some semantical changes. I committed it earlier, but will go back and fix the things you pointed out. I especially l

Re: Automated package building (LONG)

2006-01-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: > > > Automated Building Procedures (sect2 header) > > There are times when automating the building of a package can come in > handy. Everyone has their own reasons for wanting to automate building, >

Re: Automated package building (LONG)

2006-01-30 Thread Randy McMurchy
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 01/29/06 18:49 CST: > [snip all] Here is an update. Please, if you have a few minutes, check for grammar but really check for technical accuracy. I would appreciate any comments. I feel pretty good about it, and this time I'm finished, but much has been added an