Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/14/05 11:54 CST: Is there anything else that needs to be done for a final 6.1? Just discovered that the recent bugfix to reorder the CUPS and Samba bootscripts didn't fix anything. The CUPS instructions install default

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread Randy McMurchy
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/15/05 00:59 CST: Damn I had forgotten about that. How long has 6.1 been up? Proper fix is to modify the Makefile to rm -f S99cups in the affected runlevels, and recreate the tarball. I don't think Bruce has released the final version. Proper fix or not, the

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread Bruce Dubbs
DJ Lucas wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/14/05 11:54 CST: Is there anything else that needs to be done for a final 6.1? Just discovered that the recent bugfix to reorder the CUPS and Samba bootscripts didn't fix anything. The CUPS instructions install

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread DJ Lucas
DJ Lucas wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/14/05 11:54 CST: Is there anything else that needs to be done for a final 6.1? Just discovered that the recent bugfix to reorder the CUPS and Samba bootscripts didn't fix anything. The CUPS instructions install

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread Randy McMurchy
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/15/05 01:13 CST: Randy..you got it, this should do it. [snip stuff] I'm tired, and not in a position right now to do proper testing. If you think it is good, then do it. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/15/05 01:13 CST: Randy..you got it, this should do it. [snip stuff] I'm tired, and not in a position right now to do proper testing. If you think it is good, then do it. OMG. I've installed (make install) cups 10 times in the

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread Randy McMurchy
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/15/05 01:22 CST: OMG. I've installed (make install) cups 10 times in the past 5 minutes! :-D It didn't even occur that those scripts were left there from the install. Typically this is not needed with bootscripts...really I did test the interaction of the

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/15/05 01:13 CST: Randy..you got it, this should do it. I forgot to mention the fact that this doesn't fix the text in the book that says, the installed CUPS bootscripts are okay ... or whatever it says. I think we need to slow

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread DJ Lucas
DJ Lucas wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote: DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/15/05 01:13 CST: Randy..you got it, this should do it. I forgot to mention the fact that this doesn't fix the text in the book that says, the installed CUPS bootscripts are okay ... or whatever it says. I think we need

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread Randy McMurchy
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/15/05 02:00 CST: paraDuring the install, applicationCUPS/application created the startup files in filename class=directory/etc/rc.d/filename. These scripts will work in most cases, but will fail if you provide printers to samba clients.

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread Randy McMurchy
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/15/05 02:00 CST: paraDuring the install, applicationCUPS/application created the startup files in filename class=directory/etc/rc.d/filename. These scripts will work in most cases, but will fail if you provide printers to samba clients.

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/15/05 02:00 CST: paraDuring the install, applicationCUPS/application created the startup files in filename class=directory/etc/rc.d/filename. These scripts will work in most cases, but will fail if you provide

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-15 Thread Randy McMurchy
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/15/05 18:59 CST: Now onto actually fixing it. Does the suggested change, with your corrections, read well and provide the reader with correct and needed information? I think it conveys the intended message perfectly! -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-14 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/14/05 11:54 CST: I'm looking at bugzilla and see four bugs that need to be integrated into BLFS-6.1: 1519 Other programming tools 1520 Cracklib 1524 Update URLs 1529 PostgreSQL file ownership Is there anything else that needs to be done for a final

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/14/05 11:54 CST: I'm looking at bugzilla and see four bugs that need to be integrated into BLFS-6.1: 1519 Other programming tools 1520 Cracklib 1524 Update URLs 1529 PostgreSQL file ownership Is there anything else that needs to be

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/14/05 11:54 CST: I'm looking at bugzilla and see four bugs that need to be integrated into BLFS-6.1: 1519 Other programming tools 1520 Cracklib 1524 Update URLs 1529 PostgreSQL file ownership Is there anything else

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-14 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/14/05 16:29 CST: Sure. There are three commented sections in the xml. Perhaps I should remove all of them. I don't know about the other two, I believe they were already commented out. What we need *un*-commented out is the blurb about the bogus OpenSP

Re: BLFS 6.1 Final?

2005-08-14 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/14/05 11:54 CST: Is there anything else that needs to be done for a final 6.1? Just discovered that the recent bugfix to reorder the CUPS and Samba bootscripts didn't fix anything. The CUPS instructions install default