Re: Calling all testers

2007-02-13 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/13/07, Guy Dalziel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Book Version > "This is BLFS-BOOK version svn-20070211 dated February 11th, 2007. > This is the development branch of the BLFS book, currently targeting > the LFS development book" That's the development version. We're talking about the 6.2 bran

Re: Calling all testers

2007-02-13 Thread fenna
As i said before .. perfect for the SVN blfs ... but I was NOT talking about blfs-SVN. This page is from the blfs-6.2.0rc2 book: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/6.2.0-rc2/general/mc.html however this is all very theoretical .. Alexander already replied to the Wiki report I put in earlie

Re: Calling all testers

2007-02-13 Thread Guy Dalziel
Book Version "This is BLFS-BOOK version svn-20070211 dated February 11th, 2007. This is the development branch of the BLFS book, currently targeting the LFS development book" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: Se

Re: Calling all testers

2007-02-13 Thread fenna
Well Guy, that is excelent for keeping up with SVN, but we're talking about syncing blfs-6.2.0rc2 with lfs-6.2, wich uses bash-3.1 .. greetings Fenna Guy Dalziel wrote: > On 13/02/07, fenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If blfs-6.2.0 is to follow-up on lfs-6.2, why is there a patch for

Re: Calling all testers

2007-02-13 Thread Guy Dalziel
On 13/02/07, fenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If blfs-6.2.0 is to follow-up on lfs-6.2, why is there a patch for a > bash-3.2? > (lfs-6.2 is build with bash-3.1) LFS svn uses bash-3.2, and BLFS svn reflects that with proper support for it, by the time BLFS svn goes stable, hopefully LFS svn will

Re: Calling all testers

2007-02-13 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/13/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/13/07, fenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > about midnight commander 4.6.1 (blfs chapter 11) > > > > If blfs-6.2.0 is to follow-up on lfs-6.2, why is there a patch for a > > bash-3.2? > > (lfs-6.2 is build with bash-3.1) > > Excellent

Re: Calling all testers

2007-02-13 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/13/07, fenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > about midnight commander 4.6.1 (blfs chapter 11) > > If blfs-6.2.0 is to follow-up on lfs-6.2, why is there a patch for a bash-3.2? > (lfs-6.2 is build with bash-3.1) Excellent question. It shouldn't be in there if it really is just for bash-3.2. Ho

re: Calling all testers

2007-02-13 Thread fenna
> > Randy has placed Wednesday, Feb. 14th as the release date for > BLFS-6.2.0. I'd like to ask people to take a little time to review the > book and look for any changes that can improve the book before > release. > > I've created a new ticket #2242[1] to collect any small issues. > Patches are we

Re: Calling all testers

2007-02-11 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/11/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've created a new ticket #2242[1] to collect any small issues. > Patches are welcomed. Just to be clear, you don't have to send patches, but they are appreciated. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http:/

Calling all testers

2007-02-11 Thread Dan Nicholson
Randy has placed Wednesday, Feb. 14th as the release date for BLFS-6.2.0. I'd like to ask people to take a little time to review the book and look for any changes that can improve the book before release. I've created a new ticket #2242[1] to collect any small issues. Patches are welcomed. See the