Re: Epiphany - PITA or worth it?

2005-10-13 Thread Richard A Downing
Randy McMurchy wrote: it seems so pointless to install Epiphany when it itself > requires a Gecko rendering engine (Mozilla or Firefox or Thunderbird) > as a required dependency. Despite not being a GROAN user myself, I can't see the point in putting all the rest of it in the book and then miss

Re: Epiphany - PITA or worth it?

2005-10-13 Thread Mike Hernandez
It's definitely a PITA, that's for sure. But to some people, building linux from scratch is a PITA ;) I'd suggest putting epiphany in only because it is GNOME's default browser. Without it BLFS has an "incomplete" GNOME install. I say leave it in for the sake of "completeness" and allow the reader

Re: Epiphany - PITA or worth it?

2005-10-13 Thread Rainer Peter Feller
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 08:13 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: > Randy McMurchy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > +1 PITA hm the whole gnome stuff is going to be a REALPITA but without epiphany you will NOT get (y/h)elp and almost everything which has html content will not be displayed within a gome window (AF

Re: Epiphany - PITA or worth it?

2005-10-13 Thread Andrew Benton
Randy McMurchy wrote: Hi all, +1 PITA -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Epiphany - PITA or worth it?

2005-10-12 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, I just updated BLFS to the current version of GNOME's Epiphany. I spent a couple of hours today doing what I thought would be 15 minutes. First, the build fails because I didn't have the iso-codes package installed. After finally figuring out even how to download the darn thing, I discove