Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:35:12PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> I'll take a fresh
>> look at the suggestions, and if that fails I'll copy it to Bruce.
>>
> Found the error: even after I commented out the patch, I got a
> similar failure. Looking at index.xml, it was pointing
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:35:12PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'll take a fresh
> look at the suggestions, and if that fails I'll copy it to Bruce.
>
Found the error: even after I commented out the patch, I got a
similar failure. Looking at index.xml, it was pointing to the gnome
chapter. Odd
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:54:12PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > I'm trying to edit xpdf so that it again references an upstream
> > patch. I uncomment the patch, and change it to match the current
> > version...
>
> > Any suggestions ? Please ?
>
> Try looking for a mismat
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'm trying to edit xpdf so that it again references an upstream
> patch. I uncomment the patch, and change it to match the current
> version...
> Any suggestions ? Please ?
Try looking for a mismatched tag *above* the area you mentioned.
If you put the the page on quantum o
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/30/08 18:36 CST:
> Right off the bat I see a difference in the way the word compact
> is quoted. Not sure if that matters though, I doubt it.
I uncommented the patch stuff in the xpdf.xml file and validated.
It's fine. You're barking up the wrong tree. :-)
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 03/30/08 18:30 CST:
> I'm trying to edit xpdf so that it again references an upstream
> patch. I uncomment the patch, and change it to match the current
> version...
>
>
>
> Let's compare that to to the equivalent for cups -
>
>
Right off the
I'm trying to edit xpdf so that it again references an upstream
patch. I uncomment the patch, and change it to match the current
version...
Additional Downloads
Required patch: ftp://ftp.foolabs.com/pub/xpdf/xpdf-3.02pl2.patch"/>
Let's compare that to
