Thomas Trepl wrote these words on 03/21/08 12:59 CST:
> * Modify the tcpwrapper config section to read as
> "If you have TCP Wrappers installed and there is a restrictive
> /etc/hosts.deny
> file, then ensure you have an entry in the /etc/hosts.allow file for access
> from the portmap daemon th
Hi all,
ok, I'd summarize the discussion to the following:
* Move tcpwrappers to optional dependeny
* Modify the tcpwrapper config section to read as
"If you have TCP Wrappers installed and there is a restrictive /etc/hosts.deny
file, then ensure you have an entry in the /etc/hosts.allow file
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/20/08 23:42 CST:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
>> I'm confused with the boot script language. It says on the new
>> client page for NFS-Utils to only install and run the bootscripts
>> if you want the *server*, yet on the server page it says the
>> bootscripts are u
2008/3/21, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is another issue. I think the NFS Utilities-1.1.2 Client page
> should just be removed and the issues briefly discussed there put in the
> other page.
Maybe the author wanted to model the existing split for the Samba
page. If so, all configurat
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/20/08 23:27 CST:
> Perhaps the first sentence should start out:
>
> If you installed tcpwrappers before nfs-utils and enabled it by ...
Or just "If you have TCP Wrappers installed and there is a
restrictive /etc/hosts.deny file, then ..."
I look at the fact t
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I'm confused with the boot script language. It says on the new
> client page for NFS-Utils to only install and run the bootscripts
> if you want the *server*, yet on the server page it says the
> bootscripts are used for *client tools*. Confusing to me.
This is another iss
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/20/08 22:51 CST:
>> Thomas Trepl wrote:
>>
>>> Please have a look to the attached patch on the nfsutils.xml to
>>> address most of Randys points.
>> I don't think we should mention tcpwrappers in the required dependencies
>> section. It i
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/20/08 22:51 CST:
> Thomas Trepl wrote:
>
>> Please have a look to the attached patch on the nfsutils.xml to
>> address most of Randys points.
> I don't think we should mention tcpwrappers in the required dependencies
> section. It is really only a library in th
Thomas Trepl wrote:
> Please have a look to the attached patch on the nfsutils.xml to
> address most of Randys points.
I don't think we should mention tcpwrappers in the required dependencies
section. It is really only a library in this context and, as pointed
out, only needed by tcpwrappers.
Be
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 08:30:29PM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>
> So it seems that the only non-working case would be new "mount" and old
> nfs-utils, but I am not sure here. Could you please describe in detail, what
> tests and with which software versions were done prior to updating t
Hi,
I wrote:
>...
> > I'm confused with the boot script language. It says on the new
> > client page for NFS-Utils to only install and run the bootscripts
> > if you want the *server*, yet on the server page it says the
> > bootscripts are used for *client tools*. Confusing to me.
>
> As I underst
Am Donnerstag, 20. März 2008 16:11:27 schrieb Randy McMurchy:
> Hi all,
>
> Just some nitpicks about the NFS-Utils page.
Indeed, the closer we look to the NFS stuff the more inconsistencies come up.
I'll work through all the points you brought up (and fix them if i can)...
> ...
>
> I'm confused
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Just some nitpicks about the NFS-Utils page.
Let me add one more. The programs' responsibility for mounting changed between
util-linux (LFS-6.3) and util-linux-ng (LFS-SVN), as well as between nfs-utils
1.0.x and 1.1.x.
If I understand the picture correctly:
* util-l
Hi all,
Just some nitpicks about the NFS-Utils page.
It gives some information about TCP wrappers that could probably be
a bit better.
1. It does not list TCP Wrappers as an optional dependency, though
it could be argued that because Portmap is identified as a run-time
requirement (and it requir
14 matches
Mail list logo
