On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 08:26:01AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Nathan Coulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> xrandr-1.2.3
> >> I've dropped this too as part of "stop building example applications
> >> I never use".
> >
> > This one I actually use in my xrandr
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Nathan Coulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> xrandr-1.2.3
>> I've dropped this too as part of "stop building example applications
>> I never use".
>
> This one I actually use in my xrandr to setup my dualscreens for fluxbox.
Yeah, I actually think you're making
>> xrandr-1.2.3
> I've dropped this too as part of "stop building example applications
> I never use".
This one I actually use in my xrandr to setup my dualscreens for fluxbox.
> ĸen
--
Nathan Coulson (conathan)
--
Location: Alberta, Canada
Timezone: MST (-7)
Webpage: http://www.nathancoul
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:18 PM, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:49 PM, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah. I build everything that is part of the official release, for the
>>> purposes of testing the for addition to the book.
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:49 PM, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yeah. I build everything that is part of the official release, for the
>> purposes of testing the for addition to the book. Everything checks out
>> so far except for 5 video driver packages previ
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:49 PM, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah. I build everything that is part of the official release, for the
> purposes of testing the for addition to the book. Everything checks out
> so far except for 5 video driver packages previously mentioned.
>
> Vermilio
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 04:44:39AM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> Yes. I'm seeing good results with the better part of that list. Here
>> is mine (from PM package lists) for the current build (items without
>> package versions were copied from jhalfs output LFS-20081031~1700
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 09:55:58AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> Thanks for making me think about zip itself - it was
>> another thing I felt able to drop from my own builds ;)
>>
>
> Spoke too soon, xulrunner's configury got upset when it couldn't
> find zip. Oh wel
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 09:55:58AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Thanks for making me think about zip itself - it was
> another thing I felt able to drop from my own builds ;)
Spoke too soon, xulrunner's configury got upset when it couldn't
find zip. Oh well.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, d
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 04:44:39AM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> Yes. I'm seeing good results with the better part of that list. Here
> is mine (from PM package lists) for the current build (items without
> package versions were copied from jhalfs output LFS-20081031~1700CDT):
>
Just a few poin
Thomas Trepl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the days ago i set up a brand new LFS-SVN (based on 20081031) system and
> added
> some packages from the BLFS book but for each of them I checked whether there
> are new versions. The followin list shows how far I came:
>
> Updates in BLFS
> ---
>
Am Montag, 3. November 2008 12:43:23 schrieb Randy McMurchy:
> Thomas Trepl wrote these words on 11/03/08 01:03 CST:
> > 2 * glib2.19.0 dann nochmal pkgconfig mit
> > --with-installed-glib
>
> I'm just about ready to update the book as well. Let's use the Trac
> syste
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:03:19AM +0100, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the days ago i set up a brand new LFS-SVN (based on 20081031) system and
> added
> some packages from the BLFS book but for each of them I checked whether there
> are new versions. The followin list shows how far I came
Thomas Trepl wrote these words on 11/03/08 01:03 CST:
> 2 * glib2.19.0 dann nochmal pkgconfig mit
> --with-installed-glib
I'm just about ready to update the book as well. Let's use the Trac
system so that we don't step on one another's toes.
I thought that version
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:03:19 +0100
Thomas Trepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question to you - do you have the same experiences that the version
> upgrades are working ok? If so, I'll go for preparing patches on the book to
> reflect those updates. If not, a short note would be great!
>
I'
Hi all,
the days ago i set up a brand new LFS-SVN (based on 20081031) system and added
some packages from the BLFS book but for each of them I checked whether there
are new versions. The followin list shows how far I came:
Updates in BLFS
---
1 * pkgconfig 0.23
2
16 matches
Mail list logo
