RPM

2008-04-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be compliant with the Linux Standards Base. It doesn't have to be for 6.3, but it is relatively easy. The install issues: Requires beecrypt (CMMI) RPM is basically CMMI, but needs --without-selinux for LFS The in

Re: RPM

2008-04-21 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/21/08 22:56 CST: > I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be > compliant with the Linux Standards Base. Cool. You're thinking it would be just another package like all the others? What I mean is; that we won't

Re: RPM

2008-04-21 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be > compliant with the Linux Standards Base. Which version? 4.x and 5.x are completely different beasts. Anyway, LFS contains a severe deviation from LSB (no libncurses.so.5 by default, only

Re: RPM

2008-04-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/21/08 22:56 CST: >> I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be >> compliant with the Linux Standards Base. > > Cool. You're thinking it would be just another package like all the

Re: RPM

2008-04-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be >> compliant with the Linux Standards Base. > > Which version? 4.x and 5.x are completely different beasts. According to www.rpm.org, the curre

Re: RPM

2008-04-21 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
2008/4/22, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be > >> compliant with the Linux Standards Base. > > > > Which version