On Τετ, Αύγ 09, at 09:52 Dan Nicholson wrote:
Actually, it was Archaic who was running 1.5.11 and came in with an
emphatic it's been stable for months or something similar. If you
can believe that.
That's plain wrong. :)
He is running an old stable 1.4.* something.
Thank god,he didn't
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
On Τετ, Αύγ 09, at 09:52 Dan Nicholson wrote:
Actually, it was Archaic who was running 1.5.11 and came in with an
emphatic it's been stable for months or something similar. If you
can believe that.
That's plain wrong. :)
He is running an old stable 1.4.* something.
Hi Miguel,
On Wed, Aug 09, at 05:12 Miguel Bazdresch wrote:
Recently I saw a patch for a vulnerability in mutt 1.5.11. Wouldn't it
be better to upgrade to 1.5.12?
I think that too and I am the one who submitted the patch!. :)
But...
The first thing that we have to know,is that no one from
On 8/9/06, Ag. Hatzimanikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Miguel,
On Wed, Aug 09, at 05:12 Miguel Bazdresch wrote:
Recently I saw a patch for a vulnerability in mutt 1.5.11. Wouldn't it
be better to upgrade to 1.5.12?
I think that too and I am the one who submitted the patch!. :)
But...
The
