On 8/24/10 9:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> If the system time is too far off the network time, then ntpd just
> exits. This can happen easily if the hwclock is set to utc and
> /etc/sysconfig/clock is not (or vice versa).
Not if it is started with -gx. I've just tested and confirmed. I set my
date
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/23/10 6:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
What if the ntp server provided is down like in the 2nd entry above?
>>> Or (for who knows what reason) outgoing
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
> wrote:
>> On 8/23/10 6:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> What if the ntp server provided is down like in the 2nd entry above?
>> Or (for who knows what reason) outgoing ICMP packets are blocked where
>> you have no control?
>>
>
On 8/23/10 6:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> What if the ntp server provided is down like in the 2nd entry above?
Or (for who knows what reason) outgoing ICMP packets are blocked where
you have no control?
> This problem is not easily solved.
Understood and agreed. Again, I think that initial set o
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 8/23/10 4:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Since we use *pool.ntp.org, how would you propose doing that?
>> I agree that it would be nice, but I don't know how.
>
> I don't know either, at least, I haven't given much thought to it. My
> solution for myself was just to assu
On 8/23/10 4:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Since we use *pool.ntp.org, how would you propose doing that?
> I agree that it would be nice, but I don't know how.
I don't know either, at least, I haven't given much thought to it. My
solution for myself was just to assume a correct date has been set at
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 8/23/10 3:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> You are quoting out of context. The full startup is:
>>
>> boot_mesg "Starting ntpd..."
>> ntpd -gqx
>> loadproc /usr/sbin/ntpd
>
> Ah, my mistake. I didn't actually see the loadproc line underneath. In
> theory, yes, ntpd -q sho
On 8/23/10 3:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> You are quoting out of context. The fill startup is:
>
> boot_mesg "Starting ntpd..."
> ntpd -gqx
> loadproc /usr/sbin/ntpd
Ah, my mistake. I didn't actually see the loadproc line underneath. In
theory, yes, ntpd -q should be run once first, to update the
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This has come up before, but I want to bring it up again now because
> it's such a simple fix to an old problem.
>
> Given that the purpose of the init script is to (as the book puts it):
> "run ntpd continuously and allow it to synchronize the time in a gradual
Hi,
This has come up before, but I want to bring it up again now because
it's such a simple fix to an old problem.
Given that the purpose of the init script is to (as the book puts it):
"run ntpd continuously and allow it to synchronize the time in a gradual
manner.", the current options passe
10 matches
Mail list logo
