Re: [blfs-dev] Adding a note to xorg page

2014-08-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: On 08/24/2014 03:52 AM, Christopher Gregory wrote: Hello, I think that it would be a good idea to add to the XORG section that the packages should be installed in published order from the top of the xorg section through the subsequent sections. This would cut down on the number

Re: [blfs-dev] Adding a note to xorg page

2014-08-23 Thread Armin K.
On 08/24/2014 03:52 AM, Christopher Gregory wrote: > Hello, > > I think that it would be a good idea to add to the XORG section that the > packages should be installed in published order from the top of the xorg > section through the subsequent sections. > > This would cut down on the number of e

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r14026 - branches/systemd/x/lib

2014-08-23 Thread Armin K.
On 08/24/2014 04:11 AM, c...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: > Author: cjg > Date: Sat Aug 23 19:11:05 2014 > New Revision: 14026 > > Log: > Changed Recommended to Required on libdrm page as pciaccess is required to > build libdrm > > Modified: >branches/systemd/x/lib/libdrm.xml > > Modif

Re: [blfs-dev] TeX without the binary - second (better) progress report

2014-08-23 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:22:37PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 03:19:32AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > From that, I surmise that it OUGHT to be possible to build the way > > we currently do (configure, configure asymptote, make. make > > asymptote, check, check asymptot

[blfs-dev] Adding a note to xorg page

2014-08-23 Thread Christopher Gregory
Hello, I think that it would be a good idea to add to the XORG section that the packages should be installed in published order from the top of the xorg section through the subsequent sections. This would cut down on the number of emails people send in stating that a particular library was not fo

Re: [blfs-dev] TeX without the binary - second (better) progress report

2014-08-23 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 03:19:32AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > From that, I surmise that it OUGHT to be possible to build the way > we currently do (configure, configure asymptote, make. make > asymptote, check, check asymptote) and then : > > make install-strip [ anything to save space, but it