Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-05 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 04:38:23AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:51:15AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > The hack is actually for Xorg's own modesetting driver, but if it > > > also fixes things for ati/amdgpu then all will be good. > > > > >

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-04 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:51:15AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > The hack is actually for Xorg's own modesetting driver, but if it > > also fixes things for ati/amdgpu then all will be good. > > > > I'm attaching a headed version of the patch: AFAICS it is less > dangerous than th

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-03 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 08:35:37PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:53:21PM -0500, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > > > > https://ch1p.io/blog/1/ (WARNING: The Security Certificate expired on 10/1. > > The site and the links within (attached) are safe.) > > https://stacko

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-03 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 08:30:38PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 09:17:03AM +0200, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 03/10/2019 02:48, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > Thanks, I'm inclined to bellieve that I'm barking up the wrong tr

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-03 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 09:17:03AM +0200, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On 03/10/2019 02:48, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > [...] > > > > Thanks, I'm inclined to bellieve that I'm barking up the wrong tree. > > > > My current xorg-server build configures and runs make as user lfs, > >

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-03 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:53:21PM -0500, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > > Good evening folks > > I found the following things out while looking online for solutions to this > problem earlier. It seems to be due to the way that permissions are handled > on card0, since AMDGPU/ATI drivers need access to

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-03 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On 03/10/2019 02:48, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > [...] > > Thanks, I'm inclined to bellieve that I'm barking up the wrong tree. > > My current xorg-server build configures and runs make as user lfs, > because I eventually discovered that my normal build-as-root was > forcing suid install. S

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-02 Thread Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
On 2019-10-02 18:49, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 05:40:28PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 10/2/19 3:41 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:25:58PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 10/1/19 9:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-02 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:28:10PM +, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote: > On October 2, 2019 3:41:05 PM CDT, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev > wrote: > (snipping most) > >[37.282] (--) AMDGPU(0): Chipset: "Unknown AMD Radeon GPU" (ChipID > >= 0x15d8) > > > Is this an add-on card, or Mobo? Searching

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-02 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 05:40:28PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 10/2/19 3:41 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:25:58PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On 10/1/19 9:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 02:05

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-02 Thread DJ Lucas via blfs-dev
On October 2, 2019 3:41:05 PM CDT, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > >[37.281] (II) AMDGPU: Driver for AMD Radeon: >All GPUs supported by the amdgpu kernel driver >[37.281] (II) modesetting: Driver for Modesetting Kernel Drivers: >kms >[37.281] (++) using VT number 1 > >[3

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 10/2/19 3:41 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:25:58PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 10/1/19 9:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 02:05:57PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 9/25/19 12:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-02 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:25:58PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 10/1/19 9:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 02:05:57PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On 9/25/19 12:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > > > > > For comparison

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-01 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 10/1/19 9:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 02:05:57PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 9/25/19 12:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: For comparison, attached are two elogind builds. The 90 build is a direct xorg build and completes xorg at about l

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-01 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:23:54AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: (second attempt, hopefully this time with the attachment) > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 02:05:57PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 9/25/19 12:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > > For comparison, attached are tw

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-10-01 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 02:05:57PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 9/25/19 12:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > For comparison, attached are two elogind builds. The 90 build is a direct > xorg build and completes xorg at about line 88. The 9a build followed a > jhalfs g

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-09-26 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 06:07:48PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > I think the elogind circular dependency might be what matters most As Bruce surmised, it made no difference. I completed the build, then rebooted to ensure that elogind would definitely come up. The initial confirmatio

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-09-26 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 06:07:48PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:23:35AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > > > Around 5 minutes ago, I finished installing X on my elogind system. I > > started late last night. I just started X an

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-09-25 Thread Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
On 9/25/19 12:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:23:35AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: Hi folks, Around 5 minutes ago, I finished installing X on my elogind system. I started late last night. I just started X and found that I do have a working keyboa

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-09-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 9/25/19 12:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:23:35AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: Hi folks, Around 5 minutes ago, I finished installing X on my elogind system. I started late last night. I just started X and found that I do have a working keyboar

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-09-25 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:23:35AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > Hi folks, > > > Around 5 minutes ago, I finished installing X on my elogind system. I > started late last night. I just started X and found that I do have a working > keyboard and mouse, and elogind-daemon Hi people,

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-09-23 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:56:28PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 9/23/19 12:21 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 06:01:21PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > For the moment I'll just repeat my earlier comment that on haswell > > > with elo

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-09-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 9/23/19 12:21 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 06:01:21PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: For the moment I'll just repeat my earlier comment that on haswell with elogind graphics I got X but no perms on keyboard or mouse ^ |

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-09-23 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 06:01:21PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > For the moment I'll just repeat my earlier comment that on haswell > with elogind graphics I got X but no perms on keyboard or mouse ^ | and integrated -- thread 'main' panicked at 'gir

Re: [blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-09-23 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:23:35AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > Hi folks, > > > Around 5 minutes ago, I finished installing X on my elogind system. I > started late last night. I just started X and found that I do have a working > keyboard and mouse, and elogind-daemon said the fo

[blfs-dev] elogind X build order

2019-09-23 Thread Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
Hi folks, Around 5 minutes ago, I finished installing X on my elogind system. I started late last night. I just started X and found that I do have a working keyboard and mouse, and elogind-daemon said the following at the console (copied out of /var/log/sys.log for ease of use): Sep 23 11:0