Re: [blfs-dev] GTK Engines

2016-09-28 Thread Tim Tassonis
On 09/28/2016 09:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Douglas R. Reno wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote: Hi all I just compiled http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome /sources/gtk-engines/2.20/gtk-engines-2.20.2.tar.bz2 after having installed latest gtk2 and gtk3, and the engines a

Re: [blfs-dev] GTK Engines

2016-09-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Douglas R. Reno wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote: Hi all Sorry, I am aware of the fact that this has been discussed on the list and I would have had the chance to raise my objections against the removal of gtk-engines then, but I still would vote to re-integrate gtk

Re: [blfs-dev] GTK Engines

2016-09-28 Thread Douglas R. Reno
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote: > Hi all > > Sorry, I am aware of the fact that this has been discussed on the list and > I would have had the chance to raise my objections against the removal of > gtk-engines then, but I still would vote to re-integrate gtk-engines > (versi

[blfs-dev] GTK Engines

2016-09-28 Thread Tim Tassonis
Hi all Sorry, I am aware of the fact that this has been discussed on the list and I would have had the chance to raise my objections against the removal of gtk-engines then, but I still would vote to re-integrate gtk-engines (version 2.20.2) again. My reasoning: - While gtk2 will eventually

Re: [blfs-dev] gtk-engines

2016-09-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Douglas R. Reno wrote: On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Douglas R. Reno wrote: On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Should we archive this? The only references I see are: archive/gnome-obsolete/gnome-themes.xml: x/lib/gtk+2.xml: So it appear

Re: [blfs-dev] gtk-engines

2016-09-03 Thread Douglas R. Reno
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Douglas R. Reno wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Bruce Dubbs >> wrote: >> >> Should we archive this? The only references I see are: >>> >>> archive/gnome-obsolete/gnome-themes.xml:>> linkend="gtk-engines"/> >>> x/lib/gtk+2.xml

Re: [blfs-dev] gtk-engines

2016-09-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Douglas R. Reno wrote: On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Should we archive this? The only references I see are: archive/gnome-obsolete/gnome-themes.xml: x/lib/gtk+2.xml: So it appears to not be used. It is listed in x/lib/lib.xml as systemd only. It does co

Re: [blfs-dev] gtk-engines

2016-09-03 Thread Douglas R. Reno
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Should we archive this? The only references I see are: > > archive/gnome-obsolete/gnome-themes.xml: > x/lib/gtk+2.xml: > > So it appears to not be used. It is listed in x/lib/lib.xml as systemd > only. > > It does contain some ad

[blfs-dev] gtk-engines

2016-09-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Should we archive this? The only references I see are: archive/gnome-obsolete/gnome-themes.xml: x/lib/gtk+2.xml: So it appears to not be used. It is listed in x/lib/lib.xml as systemd only. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfro

[blfs-dev] GTK Engines

2016-04-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I just noticed that we only reference GTK Engines-2.20.2 in the book at gtk+2 in a note that gnome-themes (not in the book) needs GTK Engines. I propose removing GTK Engines from the book and the parenthetical note in gtk+2 that references it. Any objections? -- Bruce -- http://lists.linux