Hello,
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 14:17 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> On 4/3/20 2:01 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 12:43 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > On 4/3/20 12:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > > > On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > > > On
On 4/3/20 2:01 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 12:43 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/3/20 12:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
wrote:
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 12:43 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 4/3/20 12:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via
On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SV
On 4/3/20 12:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is th
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401
is not including the 5.6 family??
My own point of interest with 5.6 is the time_namespace
(for containers).
Is 5.6.2
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
> >
> > Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401
> > is not including the 5.
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401
is not including the 5.6 family??
My own point of interest with 5.6 is the time_namespace
(for containers).
Is 5.6.
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401
is not including the 5.6 family??
My own point of interest with 5.6 is the time_namespace
(for containers).
Is 5.6.2 too new to be considered for the (B)LFS project?
--
You
