Hello there,
My LFS-5.1.1 is runnin' fairly.I've also made a live cd of it and it is
also workin'nice on every machine.I've also extanded my LFS by installin'
a desktop environment.I mean .. now a fully customized linux is runnin' on
my machine .. but when I tried to make a live cd now of this exi
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> A few of the pre-existing ones no longer appear. I think Gnumeric was
>> one. And the file cabinet icon is missing on the panel when I use the
>> system variables, but present when the variables aren't set.
>>
>> Thanks for the firefox example. I will add that.
>
Stef Bon wrote:
rm /usr/src/linux
should be rm -rf /usr/src/linux
mkdir -p /usr/src/linux/include
ln -sf ../../../include/asm /usr/src/linux/include/asm
ln -sf ../../../include/linux /usr/src/linux/include/linux
The directories /usr/src/linux/include/asm and /usr/src/linux/include/linux
now are poi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few of the pre-existing ones no longer appear. I think Gnumeric was
one. And the file cabinet icon is missing on the panel when I use the
system variables, but present when the variables aren't set.
Thanks for the firefox example. I will add that.
Er.. well you'll need
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I added these system variables to get the menus. There are a few icons
>> that still aren't visible. I don't think I used --sysconfdir, however.
>> I'll recompile and see if there is any difference.
>>
>> XDG_DATA_DIRS=$GARNOME/share
>> XDG_CONFIG_DIRS=$GARNOME/et
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Stef Bon wrote:
>> Well a solution is to make a directory /usr/src/linux/include,
>> which is a real directory, not a symlink to somewhere.
>>
>> Now put in here the symbolic links asm and linux which are pointing to
>> /usr/linux/include/asm and /usr/linux/include/linux (
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added these system variables to get the menus. There are a few icons
that still aren't visible. I don't think I used --sysconfdir, however.
I'll recompile and see if there is any difference.
XDG_DATA_DIRS=$GARNOME/share
XDG_CONFIG_DIRS=$GARNOME/etc/xdg
Setting those e
Stef Bon wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
Stef Bon wrote:
Well a solution is to make a directory /usr/src/linux/include,
which is a real directory, not a symlink to somewhere.
Now put in here the symbolic links asm and linux which are pointing to
/usr/linux/include/asm and /usr/linux/include/linux (in
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:32:44 -0400 (Etc/GMT), Mukesh Kaushal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello there,
> My LFS-5.1.1 is runnin' fairly.I've also made a live cd of it and it is
> also workin'nice on every machine.I've also extanded my LFS by installin'
> a desktop environment.I mean .. now a fully
> Simon Geard wrote:
>> Hi all... anyone else playing with Gnome 2.10 yet?
>>
>> I've just finished building everything, but when it came to running the
>> it, there are two unfortunate problems, possibly related:
>>
>> 1. The Applications menu is missing everything except the "Run
>> Application"
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Stef Bon wrote:
>> Well a solution is to make a directory /usr/src/linux/include,
>> which is a real directory, not a symlink to somewhere.
>>
>> Now put in here the symbolic links asm and linux which are pointing to
>> /usr/linux/include/asm and /usr/linux/include/linux (
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote these words on 03/14/05 17:10 CST:
Well, just to answer myself, I took the dirty route and untarred the
kernel sources in /usr/src/linux and now it builds fine. User space
applications shouldn't need to build against the raw kernel sources.
Does anyone kno
Stef Bon wrote:
Well a solution is to make a directory /usr/src/linux/include,
which is a real directory, not a symlink to somewhere.
Now put in here the symbolic links asm and linux which are pointing to
/usr/linux/include/asm and /usr/linux/include/linux (in that order).
/usr/linux ? You've los
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>> Uh-oh, it's that time again. New kernel headers, new breakage. It seems
>> that iptables has issues with the new kernel headers. Anybody else
>> seeing this?
>>
>> cc -O2 -Wall -Wunused -I/usr/src/linux/include -Iinclude/
>> -DIPTABLES_VERSION=\"1.3.
Simon Geard wrote:
Hi all... anyone else playing with Gnome 2.10 yet?
I've just finished building everything, but when it came to running the
it, there are two unfortunate problems, possibly related:
1. The Applications menu is missing everything except the "Run
Application" option.
2. Selecting th
Jim Gifford wrote:
just add the following to you makefiles KERNEL_DIR=/usr
that will fix the issue.
No it didn't. That was the first thing I tried and it didn't work
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
Hi all... anyone else playing with Gnome 2.10 yet?
I've just finished building everything, but when it came to running the
it, there are two unfortunate problems, possibly related:
1. The Applications menu is missing everything except the "Run
Application" option.
2. Selecting the latter (or equ
Hello there,
My LFS-5.1.1 is runnin' fairly.I've also made a live cd of it and it is
also workin'nice on every machine.I've also extanded my LFS by installin'
a desktop environment.I mean .. now a fully customized linux is runnin' on
my machine .. but when I tried to make a live cd now of this exis
18 matches
Mail list logo
