Re: Transfig.3.2.4 errors: NOW XFIG

2005-08-26 Thread Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words Declan Moriarty wrote these words on 08/25/05 13:00 CST: Thanks Randy - that patch rocks. No complaints, no bellyaching from patch, no errors. Glad I could help. Ahem! Transfig is there and loaded, but /blushing. I was actually _wrong_

Re: gcc 2.95.x

2005-08-26 Thread Dan Osterrath
Andrew Benton schrieb: Dan Osterrath wrote: I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system Isn't libstdc++.so.5 installed by gcc-3.3? Indeed, this is built by gcc 3.2 and 3.3. Thanx for the tip. /me asks himself how could his mind got to 2.95.x... signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: gcc 2.95.x

2005-08-26 Thread Richard A Downing
Andrew Benton wrote: Dan Osterrath wrote: Hi, I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system Isn't libstdc++.so.5 installed by gcc-3.3? Yes, gcc-3.3.6 in the BLFS svn. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ:

lowlevellock.h (was Re: gcc 2.95.x)

2005-08-26 Thread Dan Osterrath
But then anoher question: Why does /usr/include/bits/stdio-lock.h from glibc-2.3.4-20040701 include lowlevellock.h, which does not exist on my system? Did it exists in the kernel headers which were deleted after successfully compiling glibc? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: gcc 2.95.x

2005-08-26 Thread Andrew Benton
Dan Osterrath wrote: Hi, I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system Isn't libstdc++.so.5 installed by gcc-3.3? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Problems with passwd after reinstalling shadow

2005-08-26 Thread Jean-Pierre Bogler
Hello all, i am very new to the blfs mailinglist and I am doing my first try to build up an own system from scratch. My BLFS shall become a nice little Samba DC in future. So I looked up the samba dependencies in the book and decided to install Linux-PAM-0.80 with cracklib-2.8.3. Everything

firefox-1.0.6 gtk+2.8.0

2005-08-26 Thread frank
hi! i dont get firefox-1.0.6 starting up. i have gtk+2.8.0/2 which needs cairo and pango with cairo support installed. it starts (which is known and ok according to former posts): *** nsExtensionManager::_disableObsoleteExtensions - failure, catching exception so finalize window can close

Re: Problems with passwd after reinstalling shadow

2005-08-26 Thread Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words Hello all, i am very new to the blfs mailinglist and I am doing my first try to build up an own system from scratch. My BLFS shall become a nice little Samba DC in future. So I looked up the samba dependencies in the book and decided to

Re: NOW XFIG Errors

2005-08-26 Thread Declan Moriarty
Further to that, xfig is seriously awol, or mebbe the Widgets The widgets compiled from the xc/lib/Xaw3d/README.XAW3D without incident. I don't think I have latex, and it seems to be wedded into this also. Some functions just plain don't work. the File/open only lets me choose figs. I can't

Re: Problems with passwd after reinstalling shadow

2005-08-26 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi snip Everything seemed to work good and I am quite sure that I did everything like it was described. The only little problem I noticed was that the pam.d directory was not created by the install of pam, I also ran into the same situation before, or even worse, on reinstalling

Re: gcc 2.95.x

2005-08-26 Thread Dan Osterrath
Declan Moriarty schrieb: You might need gcc-2.95 to make gcc-2.95 :-/. Very nice circular dependency. :-( If you just want libstdc++.so.5, do you want it attached to an email? No thanks, I got it from gcc 3.3.6 already. Have you installed Openoffice? You may have libstdc++.so.5 in the

Re: firefox-1.0.6 gtk+2.8.0

2005-08-26 Thread Randy McMurchy
frank wrote these words on 08/26/05 09:55 CDT: i dont get firefox-1.0.6 starting up. i have gtk+2.8.0/2 which needs cairo and pango with cairo support installed. it starts (which is known and ok according to former posts): *** nsExtensionManager::_disableObsoleteExtensions - failure,

Re: firefox-1.0.6 gtk+2.8.0

2005-08-26 Thread frank
Randy McMurchy wrote: According the Moz FAQ, this is caused if you installed firefox and then didn't run it one time as root. This is required, as the nsExtensionManager creates some files (and a dir) in the /usr/lib/firefox-1.0.6 directory. yes, i am aware of that. this happens running

AW: Problems with passwd after reinstalling shadow

2005-08-26 Thread Jean-Pierre Bogler
Hi, thanks to all for your help. I am sorry that I started a new thread within an old one, I didn't know that this happens when I reply with another subject. But now the good message I could solve my passwd problem. The failure was that I mistyped while preparing the configure file of pam.

Re: firefox-1.0.6 gtk+2.8.0

2005-08-26 Thread Randy McMurchy
frank wrote these words on 08/26/05 11:52 CDT: i assume you have firefox running properly on a gtk+-2.8.0 build. Yes, I do. Thunderbird as well. just for information, do you also get these gdk warnings? Yes. Tons of warnings. -- Randy rmlinux: [bogomips 3923.96] [GNU ld version 2.16.1]

Re: firefox-1.0.6 gtk+2.8.0

2005-08-26 Thread Guido Schimmels
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:55:36 +0200 frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in addition there are lots of gdk warnings (also repeated): (firefox-bin:2021): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_drawable_get_colormap: assertion `GDK_IS_DRAWABLE (drawable)' failed (firefox-bin:2021): Gdk-WARNING **:

Re: firefox-1.0.6 gtk+2.8.0

2005-08-26 Thread frank
Guido Schimmels wrote: This is a bug in gtk-2.8.0. gtk-2.8.0 is a lemon, gtk-2.8.1 is worse. Upgrade to gtk-2.8.2. I don't promise it solves all the firefox issues (I can't know). But you want to do that anyway. gtk-2.8.0 and gtk-2.8.1 are really, really buggy. just for info: i did the

Re: firefox-1.0.6 gtk+2.8.0

2005-08-26 Thread Randy McMurchy
frank wrote these words on 08/26/05 15:27 CDT: ok, looks like gtk is not the reason. i'll try harder with firefox compilation. maybe i'll also try the 'mozilla way' (if i ever find out what it is). I wish I could help. I just finished updating the book with updates to both Firefox and

Re: firefox-1.0.6 gtk+2.8.0

2005-08-26 Thread Dan Nicholson
Just for everyone's information (if you care), it would probably make a difference if you check out the CVS because the *nix builds are moving to a default of using cairo. But this isn't implemented in the 1.0.x line. Based on Randy's info, it sounds like gtk-2.8.x works with firefox and