David Ciecierski wrote:
Just touching the *1.2.9.patch is sufficient to move on (until you
have to replace the empty file later.. heh).
It's that need to replace keytrans that puzzles me most. Btw: I recall
there was a section in the makefile that I claimed responsible for that
and commented
On 9/24/05, randhir phagura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why is it required that building of a package be done as an unprevilged
> user? I saw this indication in the Book too ("Now as root user issue the
> following command...") but never bothered to investigate. I tend to automate
> my install o
On 9/24/05, Lennon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually it's so I can tell easily which ones I've installed already;
> and so that 'for i in /etc/gconf/schemas/* ; do gconftool-2
> --install-schema-file=$i ; done' doesn't reinstall things
> unnecesarily.
Instead of the for command above use
On 9/23/05, David Ciecierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This 'issue' does get a little tedious at times, because some packages'
> make install fails when it cannot install schemas and/or update
> scrollkeeper database. Some also ignore the --disable-schemas-install.
> You then have to manually
David Ciecierski wrote:
> Is that BLFS-SVN? If so I'll try to compile it here and see what
> happens. Which version of aspell are you trying to make friends with..?
BLFS-SVN and aspell-0.60.3 .
--
Lennon Victor Cook
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linu
On 9/26/05, Luca Dionisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is a little enhancement on the hint of Matthias S. Benkmann
> on the use of "package users" instead of root when installing
> packages.
> It is about the use of another group, similar to "install", with the
> directories /etc/rc.d/...
> I fou
In my attempts to compile a mail client to save me from GMail's woes,
I am compiling aspell. Well, except that it tells me this as it tries
to build
Is that BLFS-SVN? If so I'll try to compile it here and see what
happens. Which version of aspell are you trying to make friends with..?
--
Dav
Just touching the *1.2.9.patch is sufficient to move
on (until you have to replace the empty file later.. heh).
It's that need to replace keytrans that puzzles me most. Btw: I recall
there was a section in the makefile that I claimed responsible for that
and commented out. After deleting the w
Hello,
I thought I'd recap on this 'problem'... Well, usurprisingly it was just
me using gstreamer for the first time; there was nothing wrong with ALSA
but rather gstreamer - it defaults to OSS, and I don't have ALSA-OSS
plugin. All that I had to do was go gstreamer-properties -> choose ALSA.
David Ciecierski wrote:
I came across the same, but I went to check that keytrans only after
quite some digging + googling... The reason behind the file's content
being erased still puzzles me - the 1.2.6 should not get applied, as we
manually set 1.2.9. But true enough, seems the only way such
Hello,
Just cooked up another shiny problem to spam the list... I know I could
use Xine backend to Totem to get DivX playback, but as I've mentioned
somewhere already, all my heart is with gstreamer (so to speak). It does
have a divx plugin, obviously, but even though it detects divx on my
sys
--- Doug Reich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pass it through sed?
>
> $ for ... do cat `sed -e 's/ *#.*$//' >> largefile ; done
Perfect. Thanks!
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
http://linuxfromscratch
[code]
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -DPACKAGE=\"xmlsec1\" -I../..
-I../../include -D__XMLSEC_FUNCTION__=__FUNCTION__ -DXMLSEC_NO_XSLT=1
-DXMLSEC_NO_XKMS=1 -I/opt/firefox/include/firefox-1.0.6/nspr
-I/opt/firefox/include/firefox-1.0.6/nss -DXMLSEC_CRYPTO_NSS=1
-I/usr/include/libxml2 -O3
Pass it through sed?
$ for ... do cat `sed -e 's/ *#.*$//' >> largefile ; done
Alternatively, you could do this without 'for':
$ cat `cat filelist.txt | sed -e 's/ *#.*//'`
You can throw in any other separators into the sed statement, as well.
-Doug
benjamin stathos wrote:
It seems I spoke
It seems I spoke too soon. I should have been more explicit. The echo
$i was just an example, but not what I really wanted to do. Here's a
better demonstration.
for i in `cat filelist`; do cat $i >> largefile; done
The whitespace problem is now different. The offending line in $i is:
tempfile #O
>From the man:
"The wtmp file records all logins and logouts."
Where does this info get used?
Alex
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Please read the utmp man page. Every question you ask in the message
> above is answered. :-)
>
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://w
Alex Prinsier wrote these words on 09/26/05 15:22 CST:
> Indeed a nice work around. But I'm getting confused now that you tell me
> about lastlog.
>
> Aren't you talking about utmp/wtmp? What's the difference between
> /var/log/wtmp, utmp and lastlog?
>
> My first thought was that lastlog just ke
Indeed a nice work around. But I'm getting confused now that you tell me
about lastlog.
Aren't you talking about utmp/wtmp? What's the difference between
/var/log/wtmp, utmp and lastlog?
My first thought was that lastlog just keeps a log of which user logged
in from where the last time. Utmp and
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> >
> >
> >>choose_boundary hostid = socket.gethostbyname(socket.gethostname())
> >>gaierror: (-2, 'Name or service not known')
> >>
> >>test_urllib2 No handlers could be found for logger "cookielib" test
> >>test_urllib2 failed -- Traceback (most rec
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> In my attempts to compile a mail client to save me from GMail's woes,
> I am compiling aspell. Well, except that it tells me this as it tries
> to build:
> >>>
> ./.libs/libaspell.so: undefined reference to
> `acommon::HashTable::init(unsigned int)'
I thought I would share my findings with the list. One of the things I've
been doing is using a directory (instead of a dedicated partition) to store
my root file system and resulting BLFS operating system. I use the
guidelines described for mounting a directory instead of using a partition.
E
It seems like I am another one who needs to pay more attention to
the address field when doing a reply :)
I did a reply to Nick instead of BLFS-support.
Just for completeness, and for what it's worth, I post the
lacking mails of this thread.
On 9/24/05, Luca Dionisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's from back at m118, but should still give you a good idea of what
to expect. I know David Ciecierski (as he mentioned elsewhere in this
thread) is working with those on current beta2 (m126 IIRC).
I indeed am. It's such a pity the box I'm compiling it on is rather
sluggish (P3 600), this
DJ Lucas wrote:
OOo-2.0 is a monster and takes quite a few hours to complete a full
build...but if you have a fast PC, go for it :-) The more eyes on it
Athlon-fx 53. In other words, I get nice quick build failures.. lol
LFS: SVN-20050910
the better...gcc4 _should_ not be an issue at all W
24 matches
Mail list logo
