Re: Problems mounting media

2005-11-09 Thread randhir phagura
Hi Dough, Hi Andrew, Thanks a lot for your tips. It will help me a lot. Kind Regards Randhir Phagura -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: apr needed for subversion [was: libcolorspace (for gst-plugins) source tarball download?]

2005-11-09 Thread Andrew Benton
Dan Nicholson wrote: Whether the layout structure needs more massaging is up to you, but I wouldn't remove the apr stuff unless you want to be the guinea pig. Well I delete /usr/build and I've not seen any problems, but that's not saying much. I only use svn to download stuff that's available

Re: apr needed for subversion [was: libcolorspace (for gst-plugins) source tarball download?]

2005-11-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 11/9/05, S. Anthony Sequeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, the news server is out of service, so I have to post this way. > > --- > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:05:17PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > Steffen R

Re: Unscrambling .. much later... C question

2005-11-09 Thread thorsten
> if (c == '0x3b' || c == '0x3a' || c == '0x2c') if (c == 0x3b || c == 0x3a || c == 0x2c) would have done, I think. using ' ' means a Character, not a hex number... Regards Thorsten Happel -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/fa

RE: Unscrambling .. much later... C question

2005-11-09 Thread David Fix
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > char c; > > if (c == ',' || c == ':' || c == ':') > > as it always passes as true. Then it folds the line in some > specious way > and I lose three letters. I did try going to the hex code > > if (c == '0x3b' || c == '0x3a' || c == '0x2c') > > and gcc got really an

Re: Unscrambling .. much later... C question

2005-11-09 Thread Declan Moriarty
For the amusement of all concerned I attach indent5.c which is lying around here at the moment. I'm actually busy and don't have a lot of time to fart with it. This is a debugging and elaboration of David Fix's indent program offered here earlier by a self confessed C illiterate. This is more or l

Re: INIT & bash

2005-11-09 Thread mess-mate
Tony Sauri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:24, mess-mate wrote: | > DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > ...snip.. | > | > Thanks for your help. | > But the error occur just after 'version 2.86 booting' | > so the interactive mode can't help. | > After INIT Net ... and versio

Re: INIT & bash

2005-11-09 Thread mess-mate
DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | mess-mate wrote: | ...snip... | | | Alright...now that I'm done poking fun. In a base LFS, again assuming lfs-bootscripts 3.2.1 | since you've not mentioned the version, the only instance of "==" exists in the text | wrapping portion of the functions sc

Re: bash_profile not being sourced

2005-11-09 Thread thorsten
David Lockwood wrote: > If I "login" inside an xterm using > $ su - username > (Password) > I can no longer start another xterm from that xterm, getting > xterm Xt error: Can't open display: Same with my System, I think this is good system behavior, why should another user be allowed to open a Win

bash_profile not being sourced

2005-11-09 Thread David Lockwood
Hi. I have read some previous threads about startup scripts but can't work out the answer to this problem. I beg some patience from those who have been through all this before. My ~/.bash_profile is not run under circumstances where I think it's supposed to be. ~/.bash_profile _does_ run when I

Xorg-6.8.2 build failure related to bison--solved

2005-11-09 Thread Ian Macdonald
Andy Thanks for the prompt reply and yes, rebuilding flex has solved the problem. begin:vcard fn:Ian Macdonald n:Macdonald;Ian adr:;;2 Jatinga Close;Johannesburg;Gauteng;;South Africa email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;home:+ 27 11 8079356 tel;cell:+ 27 83 4414738 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.

Re: Compiling OpenOffice without gcc-4.*?

2005-11-09 Thread Lennon Cook
Stef Bon wrote: > Can I compile OO 2 right away or do I need I patch for my native compiler > (gcc-3.4.1)? It should work fine on gcc3. The reason for the various gcc4 patches in different packages is because of imcompatibilities between gcc3 and 4. Some apps haven't been tested (or targeted) for g

Compiling OpenOffice without gcc-4.*?

2005-11-09 Thread Stef Bon
Hello, I see that one of the patches to compile OO 2.0 has to do with gcc version 4. I do not have gcc 4 on my computer(LFS 6.0) , but I do have j2sdk 1.5.0, compiled with another compiler (gcc-3.4.3). Can I compile OO 2 right away or do I need I patch for my native compiler (gcc-3.4.1)? Stef