Re: INIT & bash

mess-mate wrote: After my last post i've reinstalled now sysvinit and lfs-bootscripts-3.2.1. And the error is still there. I've installed an other /etc directory taken from an other perfectly running blfs system (6.1) and the error is still there. IMHO any config file ( from /etc) nor any sy

Re: Compiling OpenOffice without gcc-4.*?

Lennon Cook wrote: Stef Bon wrote: Can I compile OO 2 right away or do I need I patch for my native compiler (gcc-3.4.1)? It should work fine on gcc3. The reason for the various gcc4 patches in different packages is because of imcompatibilities between gcc3 and 4. Some apps haven't been teste

Re: bash_profile not being sourced

Solved. I'm not sure if anybody felt the answer was too obvious - if so I apologise. But it's not an answer I came across anywhere else and shells don't work the way I thought they did. The problem was a simple error in /etc/passwd - my userid didn't have the default shell specified (/bin/bash

Re: aspell files to compile

I just came back to look at this problem again, and I seem to have found a good solution. I got aspell-0.60.4, and it compiles and installs properly once I unset my CFLAGS. -- Lennon Victor Cook -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/

Re: apr needed for subversion [was: libcolorspace (for gst-plugins) source tarball download?]

On Thursday 10 November 2005 20:17, Dan Nicholson wrote: > Hey, I don't have this handy right this second, so could you tell me > what files are generated under /usr/share/apr in this method?  IIRC > the only files will be apr/build/{apr_rules.mk,libtool} in which case Precisely correct. > it doe

Re: apr needed for subversion [was: libcolorspace (for gst-plugins) source tarball download?]

On 11/10/05, S. Anthony Sequeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 09 November 2005 21:57, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > OK, attempt #2. You can control where the build directory goes with > > --with-installbuilddir. If you really don't want it, and you don't > > mind where subversion installs t

Re: Package Upgrade Question

--- Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: , > especially the section marked "Upgrade Issues". Thanks for the pointers, guys. I've gotten entirely too comfortable with the stuff out of Redmon

Re: Package Upgrade Question

On 11/10/05, Edward Poe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now for the questions: What kind of grief am > I asking for when I look to upgrade packages like gcc, > glibc, and kernel? Oddly enough, the a kernel upgrade > doesn't scare me as much as gcc and glibc do. See

Re: Package Uprades

On 11/10/05, Edward Poe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oddly enough, the a kernel upgrade > doesn't scare me as much as gcc and glibc do. Your intuition is right on that one. The kernel can be upgraded any time. Just make sure you keep an old one around that is known to work. gcc is fine to upgra

Package Upgrade Question

Hello, there! I'm a relative newcomer to Linux, having dealt with Windows and NetWare for most of my professional life. I completed the LFS 6.1 installation on fairly decent hardware, and went on to BLFS, got Samba working, even played around with some other packages out there like webmin and got

Package Uprades

Hello, there! I'm a relative newcomer to Linux, having dealt with Windows and NetWare for most of my professional life. I completed the LFS 6.1 installation on fairly decent hardware, and went on to BLFS, got Samba working, even played around with some other packages out there like webmin and got

Re: INIT & bash

DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | mess-mate wrote: | | >Thanks for your help. | >But the error occur just after 'version 2.86 booting' | >so the interactive mode can't help. | | Oh really? Glad to see that you've got it fixed. So was it the runlevel control, the | kernel mounts, functions