Problems with Openoffice-2.0.0

2005-11-18 Thread Alessandro
Hi, I have just compiled open-office on my LFS_SVN-20050322 with two problems. First, during compilation the script solenv/bin/checkdll.sh failed with the message "Unable to find libmawt.so" In fact the script have several -L... including -L/opt/jdk/jdk/jre/lib/i386 but not /opt/jdk/jdk/jre/lib/i38

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-18 Thread Jason Gurtz
On 11/18/2005 14:31, Dan Nicholson wrote: > One more Q before getting out of your hair. Any doco suggestions for > running an IMAP server. This is really what I want to do, I think. I think your two best choices for software here are either dovecot or courier-imap. Thankfully, running an imap s

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-18 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 11/18/05, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:31:13AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > > One more Q before getting out of your hair. Any doco suggestions for > > running an IMAP server. This is really what I want to do, I think. > > BLFS-6.0 and also look on postfi

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-18 Thread Archaic
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:31:13AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > One more Q before getting out of your hair. Any doco suggestions for > running an IMAP server. This is really what I want to do, I think. BLFS-6.0 and also look on postfix.org for howto's. That'll get you started. But if you buy

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-18 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 11/18/05, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you aren't adverse to buying books, > then hands down the best doco I have ever found is "The Book of Postfix" > by Hildebrandt and Koetter. Pricey, but is a nearly one-stop shop for > understanding the mail protocol and mail server theory and ap

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-18 Thread Archaic
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:52:01AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > As someone with absolutely no experience setting up a mail server > asking someone who obviously has tons of experience, what is some of > the better documentation to read on the subject? Seems there are a > ton of configuration o

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-18 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 11/16/05, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: < snip loads of technical goodies > Archaic, As someone with absolutely no experience setting up a mail server asking someone who obviously has tons of experience, what is some of the better documentation to read on the subject? Seems there are a

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-18 Thread Archaic
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 12:34:01PM +, Declan Moriarty wrote: > > This has been a very educational thread. One last thing. When a bounce > is done at smtp level, does it go to envelope sender or 'original' > sender? If the latter, I probably couldn't bounce in this email 'cage' > anyhow. Boun

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-18 Thread Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:23:05AM +, Declan Moriarty wrote: > > > > Third, If I applied things like reject_non_fqdn_sender, > > reject_unknown_sender_domain or reject_unverified_sender I would > > bounce several list members with half cocked ma

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-18 Thread Archaic
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:23:05AM +, Declan Moriarty wrote: > > Third, If I applied things like reject_non_fqdn_sender, > reject_unknown_sender_domain or reject_unverified_sender I would bounce > several list members with half cocked mail setups, I suspect. Let me try to clarify some those

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-18 Thread Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words > > And for postfix users who want to put a stranglehold on spam at the > smtp level, and avoid SA and it's huge penalty, look at the postfix > man pages for the following (note, this is very restrictive, and order > is important): > > smtpd_recipien

Re: LFS Direction: (Tangent to Get native or die!)

2005-11-18 Thread Simon Geard
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 05:16 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would ask,"Are either of those truly part of the main purpose of LFS?" > >From the book,"The goal of Linux From Scratch is to build a complete and > usable foundation-level system." The book already builds the kernel and > inetutil