On 2/12/06, Dan McGhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> 2 ./etc/sysconfig/rc
> 3 .$rc_functions
Dan,
Maybe you wrote this wrong, but the standard bootscripts source those
files, they don't execute them. So, the proper syntax is:
. /etc/sysconfig/rc
. $rc_functions
Notice the space. If tha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The bastards at antivir.de stopped to provide the free avmailgate for
> unix. the antivir as a workstation-version is still free, but
> you have
> to pay for the mailgate. I'd be ready to pay some bucks for
> the service,
> but for sure not some hundred euros per year.
>
The bastards at antivir.de stopped to provide the free avmailgate for
unix. the antivir as a workstation-version is still free, but you have
to pay for the mailgate. I'd be ready to pay some bucks for the service,
but for sure not some hundred euros per year.
Does someone know another mailgate
Dan McGhee wrote these words on 02/12/06 19:25 CST:
> Dan McGhee wrote:
>>Thanks,
>>Dan
>
> Sorry for the noise.
Was it really necessary to quote your *entire* previous post for
your two-line reply?
Sheesh, make me scroll down 3-4 pages to read, "I'm sorry, I
screwed up!"
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [G
Dan McGhee wrote:
Hplip the driver for my printer uses a bootscript from, I believe,
RedHat. Besides not getting the pretty, green OK's I, for some
reason, started getting the red warning about "if this can be traced
to a bug in the bootscripts, etc., etc., etc." The interesting thing
was th
Hplip the driver for my printer uses a bootscript from, I believe,
RedHat. Besides not getting the pretty, green OK's I, for some reason,
started getting the red warning about "if this can be traced to a bug in
the bootscripts, etc., etc., etc." The interesting thing was that hplip
was runnin
On 2/12/06, Cliff McDiarmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, it was all under /usr/local, but still interfering. I've deleted it now
> aand the gcc build went fine, check as well. I'll install elfutils in its own
> dir. as suggested.
Well, you could try using one of the configure switches to
Dan Nicholson wrote Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:27:50 -0800
> Ahh, using elfutils. That explains quite a bit. Elfutils binaries
> come under the same name as binutils, but I don't think they're
> guaranteed to be compatible with your system. They're certainly not
> widely tested. My guess here is tha
