Success at last SeaMonkey on AMD64

2006-08-10 Thread Arnie Stender
Hello, Well as I posted earlier I decided to try and compile the entire SeaMonkey suite from a common source tree. This required updating about a half dozen packages for me. As it turned out it was well worth the effort. The only change I made to what was in the svn-20060809 book which was

Re: Problem to configue my dhcpcd.

2006-08-10 Thread jeeva suresh
Interface eth0 doesn't exist. I am at work ATM, but this line is the exact line which I got while trying to configure my DHCP interface. I have notes at home, but from memory, this was a problem with my kernel, as in I didn't compile in the right drivers for my network card. Also, if you did c

Re: Follow-up on Compiling Thunderbird on AMD64

2006-08-10 Thread Arnie Stender
Joel Means wrote: You said that you got Firefox to build. Did you have to add the ac_cv_visibility_pragma=no line to the .mozconfig? I haven't tried 1.5.0.4 so I don't know if that has been fixed. If you didn't add that line for Thunderbird, you should try it. With Thunderbird 1.5.0.2, th

Re: Follow-up on Compiling Thunderbird on AMD64

2006-08-10 Thread Arnie Stender
go moko wrote: /usr/bin/ld: nsCOMPtr.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `nsGetServiceByContractIDWithError::operator()(nsID const&, void**) const' can not be used when making a shared object; Just a blind shot: Have you -fPIC option in your CFLAGS? __

Re: Follow-up on Compiling Thunderbird on AMD64

2006-08-10 Thread Joel Means
Arnie Stender wrote: Hello, OK, I have been having all kinds of problems getting Thunderbird to compile on my pure 64 build of CLFS running on AMD64. Right now I am getting a lot of errors during the final ld of .so libs. The message typically looks like this: /usr/bin/ld: nsCOMPtr.o: rel

Re: Follow-up on Compiling Thunderbird on AMD64

2006-08-10 Thread go moko
--- Arnie Stender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > OK, I have been having all kinds of problems > getting Thunderbird to > compile on my pure 64 build of CLFS running on > AMD64. Right now I am > getting a lot of errors during the final ld of .so > libs. The message > typically looks l