Ken Moffat wrote:
As a user of architectures other than x86, cdrecord itself is a
pain in the proverbial to build.
Ken
Hi Ken,
As I remember cdrecord didn't give me any grief at all. I decided to
use it because k3b was giving me so much trouble. I never did get that
one working.
Arnie
-
On 9/5/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/kernel-2.4/
>
Does that mean this is obsolete 2.4 stuff ? /me doesn't have any
non-debian|ubuntu distros handy.
I don't really know. Fedora and SuSE are still installing it...
http:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:14:02PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 9/5/06, Alessandro Alocci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Hi, sys/capability.h is installed from libcap and in this version of
> >capability.h are also defined CAP_EFFECTIVE and CAP_SET.
> >Maybe you want to have a look at the fi
On 9/5/06, Alessandro Alocci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
> In cdrecord/cdrecord.c it includes sys/capability.h. I don't have
> one of these (on a clfs box). The defines it uses are CAP_SYS_RAWIO
> (in linux/capability.h), CAP_EFFECTIVE and CAP_SET (neither is
> present on thi
Ken Moffat wrote:
> In cdrecord/cdrecord.c it includes sys/capability.h. I don't have
> one of these (on a clfs box). The defines it uses are CAP_SYS_RAWIO
> (in linux/capability.h), CAP_EFFECTIVE and CAP_SET (neither is
> present on this box). I don't know if this will be a problem with
> old
