Re: Problem with ftp access

On 11/6/07, Nicolas FRANCOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have an annoying problem with my new LFS box (LFS SVN post 6.3, BLFS > SVN) : Everything is working quite OK...except ftp. When I want to > connect to an ftp server, everything goes OK until I want to dir a > directory : > > ftp> ls > 20

Re: Numlockx can't find X

Le Tue, 6 Nov 2007 19:49:31 -0800 "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > That is just a horrible use of autoconf. The offender is the K_PATH_X > macro in acinclude.m4 which is totally unnecessary because there's > already a default autoconf macro for finding X. Try adding > x_includes=/us

Re: Numlockx can't find X

On 11/6/07, Nicolas FRANCOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While installing numlockx (a little tool to have numlock on just after > boot under xdl or kdm), I uncouter problems in the configure process : > > checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X includes. Please check > your installation

Numlockx can't find X

Hi. While installing numlockx (a little tool to have numlock on just after boot under xdl or kdm), I uncouter problems in the configure process : checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X includes. Please check your installation and add the correct paths! There's a mention in the BLFS boo

Problem with ftp access

Hi. I have an annoying problem with my new LFS box (LFS SVN post 6.3, BLFS SVN) : Everything is working quite OK...except ftp. When I want to connect to an ftp server, everything goes OK until I want to dir a directory : ftp> ls 200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV. 425 Failed to esta

Re: Weirdness in gdm shutdown

On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:54:22PM -0500, randd wrote: > > After you posted the message just prior to your last, I searched on some of > the terms in the debug log you posted (various gdm_ API calls, assert conn > != null, etc.) out of sheer curiosity. The number of gdm-related bugs > that've

Re: BLFS 6.2 and LFS 6.3

Dan Nicholson gmail.com> writes: > Use the development BLFS book. 6.2 is really long in the tooth and > will have some slight incompatibilities with LFS-6.3. > > -- > Dan Thanks for all the input! -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.

Re: BLFS 6.2 and LFS 6.3

On 11/6/07, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all. great stuff! This is the most interesting experience i have had > with Linux. Question. Is the BLFS 6.2 book ok to use with LFS 6.3 or should > I > wait for the BLFS 6.3 book. Use the development BLFS book. 6.2 is really long in the

Re: BLFS 6.2 and LFS 6.3

for me the combination of lfs-6.2 and svn-blfs-book gave me problems because of the kernel headers being too old for hal. lfs-6.3 with recent blfs-books gave me no problems so far. Olaf Am Dienstag, den 06.11.2007, 22:33 +0500 schrieb M. Shuaib Khan: > On Nov 6, 2007 9:56 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROT

Re: BLFS 6.2 and LFS 6.3

On Nov 6, 2007 9:56 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all. great stuff! This is the most interesting experience i have had > with Linux. Question. Is the BLFS 6.2 book ok to use with LFS 6.3 or should > I > wait for the BLFS 6.3 book. > It's okay to use. Though you may want to ha

BLFS 6.2 and LFS 6.3

First of all. great stuff! This is the most interesting experience i have had with Linux. Question. Is the BLFS 6.2 book ok to use with LFS 6.3 or should I wait for the BLFS 6.3 book. Thanks, Chris -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.o