Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>> That said, pam is pretty complex.
>> That is why I don't use it. Don't get me wrong. In a multi-user
>> envronment, it
>> may be necessary, but in most single user environmen
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>
>> That said, pam is pretty complex.
>
> That is why I don't use it. Don't get me wrong. In a multi-user envronment,
> it
> may be necessary, but in most single user environments it really just gets
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>> The pam system's administrator guide is very helpful.
>>
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/Linux-PAM_SAG.html
>>
>> The module pages and some general pam information are available as man
>> pages. See pam(8) and pam_unix(8)
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> The pam system's administrator guide is very helpful.
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/Linux-PAM_SAG.html
>
> The module pages and some general pam information are available as man
> pages. See pam(8) and pam_unix(8). The pam_unix page even has a
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks Dan, I'll give that a try. Any config suggestions or material
>> that could be useful in helping me. I'm not a programmer type as per se
>> and this is an area (security) that I want to lear
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:12:32PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I built gtk+-2.14.3 last night, and was more than a little surprised
> > to find that it now expects jasper (or, failing that,
> > --without-libjasper ) the co
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Dan, I'll give that a try. Any config suggestions or material
> that could be useful in helping me. I'm not a programmer type as per se
> and this is an area (security) that I want to learn more about.
The pam sys
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Started installing some security packages onto my LFS-6.3 base system.
>> Installed the following in the order listed:
>>
>> libgpg-error-1.5
>> tetex-3.0
>> libgcrypt-1.2.4
>> gnutls-1.6.3
>> crac
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Started installing some security packages onto my LFS-6.3 base system.
> Installed the following in the order listed:
>
> libgpg-error-1.5
> tetex-3.0
> libgcrypt-1.2.4
> gnutls-1.6.3
> cracklib-2.8.12
> linux-pam-0.99.10
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I built gtk+-2.14.3 last night, and was more than a little surprised
> to find that it now expects jasper (or, failing that,
> --without-libjasper ) the configure output is very helpful, but I
> had assumed jpeg2000 was anothe
I confess... I tried.
Just 2 weeks ago, one of my hrad drives crashed :-( And of course, it was
my working HD : all my work, my mails, my setups...
So after recovering from several old saves (I promise I'll do a backup
EVERY WEEK now !), I installed A Debian, just because It was quite
anoying to
Started installing some security packages onto my LFS-6.3 base system.
Installed the following in the order listed:
libgpg-error-1.5
tetex-3.0
libgcrypt-1.2.4
gnutls-1.6.3
cracklib-2.8.12
linux-pam-0.99.10.0 (created /etc/pam.conf as shown in blfs-6.3 book
under config info for this pkge)
shadow
I built gtk+-2.14.3 last night, and was more than a little surprised
to find that it now expects jasper (or, failing that,
--without-libjasper ) the configure output is very helpful, but I
had assumed jpeg2000 was another thing that hardly anybody used.
Usually, passing --without-something is a
13 matches
Mail list logo
