Re: Xorg Fatal error Could not load default font 'fixed'

2008-10-28 Thread jignesh gangani
[Continuation from previous mail. Sorry for the mail break but the size was going beyond 50 KB. ] I did 'strace X -config xorg.conf.new >/var/tmp/xorg.strace 2>&1' and here is the snippet: open("/usr/share/fonts/misc/fonts.dir", O_RDONLY) = 11 fstat(11, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=32637, ...})

Re: Xorg Fatal error Could not load default font 'fixed'

2008-10-28 Thread jignesh gangani
Ooops, Sorry. I wanted to attach the xorg.conf.new and Xorg.0.log but for some reasons I am unable to read ext3 partition from WinXP. (I am using explore2fs to read ext3 partitions.) OK. Here's the xorg.conf.new Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0

Re: Vsftpd not building on LFS/BLFS 6.3 stable system.

2008-10-28 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Zach Milton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I issue the 'make' command that the BLFS 6.3 stable book specifies for > building vsftpd, vsftpd fails to build. > > The system is LFS 6.3 stable w/ BLFS 6.3 stable. All optional dependencies > for the package are instal

Re: ESP Ghostscript-8.15.4 broken without X?

2008-10-28 Thread Zach Milton
Removing the sed command as suggested by Michael has solved the problem, and the package successfully compiles and installs. Thank you everyone, and keep up the good work! -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe:

Vsftpd not building on LFS/BLFS 6.3 stable system.

2008-10-28 Thread Zach Milton
When I issue the 'make' command that the BLFS 6.3 stable book specifies for building vsftpd, vsftpd fails to build. The system is LFS 6.3 stable w/ BLFS 6.3 stable. All optional dependencies for the package are installed with the exception of libcap (could not build libcap due to errors). Am I do

Re: Window manager without x server: follow INX path?

2008-10-28 Thread David Kuntadi
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BLFS already has plenty of packages listed that don't need X. The main > problem is that different users have different definitions of "complete > desktop environment." It's up to the users to pick and choose what they > wan

Re: Window manager without x server: follow INX path?

2008-10-28 Thread Chris Staub
David Kuntadi wrote: > > No. I am suggesting a chapter in BLFS to create complete desktop > environement without x. > > David BLFS already has plenty of packages listed that don't need X. The main problem is that different users have different definitions of "complete desktop environment." It'