lux-integ wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
> For java, only a binary was available. This
> was jdk-1_5_0_16-linux-amd64.bindownloaded from Sun.
Your version of Java's original release is over 5 years old. The _16 at
the end of the version means that it's the 16th maintenance update.
Curr
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:25 AM, lux-integ wrote:
> 1) will compiling --with-Xlint help or will this just provide more details
> why the compilation failed?
Xlint just provides more detailed warnings--it's not even related to
the actual errors you're seeing.
> 2) Ais there some error in the
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:29 AM, jignesh gangani wrote:
> Hi lux-inetg,
>
> This is just a suggestion. Try using OpenJDK (http://openjdk.java.net)
> which will
> allow you to build java and then try compiling OOo3.
>
Or, if you don't wanna go through the trouble of using OpenJDK, use
the 6.0 versi
Hi lux-inetg,
This is just a suggestion. Try using OpenJDK (http://openjdk.java.net)
which will
allow you to build java and then try compiling OOo3.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:55 PM, lux-integ wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
> I am attempting to compile openoffice-3.0.1 The box runs clfs 64Bit -amd64
>
Greetings,
I am attempting to compile openoffice-3.0.1 The box runs clfs 64Bit -amd64
kernel-2.6.27.7 gcc-4.3.2. For java, only a binary was available. This
was jdk-1_5_0_16-linux-amd64.bindownloaded from Sun.
I attempted to compile openoffice-3.0.1 and it compileswit
