you comment on
> why, and how people might help improve the situation?
>
> Simon.
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 198 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed mes
Corstiaan Hol wrote:
> I suggest you to use the following patch to fix all errors at once:
Or, wait a couple of days and I will have the new TeX Live
instructions in the book which will replace the existing TeX.
--
Randy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http:/
Op 17-feb-2010, om 07:01 heeft stosss het volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>
>> kde generally uses konsole. Do you really mean xterm?
>>
>> Does PCLinuxOS have any /dev/tty* devices?
>>
>> On the remote system, is it vi or vim?
>>
>> I think yo
Dale Stein wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone knew how to fix this problem
> I am trying to build teTeX-3.0 and it is coming back with a ulgy error.
> This was built with LFS 6.6 and BLFS svn.
>
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/blfs/tetex-src-3.0/texk/web2c/lib'
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I
I was wondering if anyone knew how to fix this problem
I am trying to build teTeX-3.0 and it is coming back with a ulgy error.
This was built with LFS 6.6 and BLFS svn.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/blfs/tetex-src-3.0/texk/web2c/lib'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -c tangleb
Simon Geard wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:32 -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> If the community's expectations are that we have the most current
>> release of every package in the most recent BLFS book, then the
>> expectations are too high and are unreasonable.
>
> It's not a reasonable expecta
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:32 -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> If the community's expectations are that we have the most current
> release of every package in the most recent BLFS book, then the
> expectations are too high and are unreasonable.
It's not a reasonable expectation that the book will *alw
